Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Over the past several months, behind-the-scenes “legislative wrangling” has led to several proposed modifications to the poorly titled Employee Free Choice Act (“EFCA”), a bill currently pending in both the House and Senate. These modifications apparently will result in the elimination from EFCA of the “undemocratic” provisions concerning card check (as the sole way to determine if employees want a union) and the restoration of secret ballot elections as the primary means of determining if employees desire union representation. In doing so, however, legislators will likely modify the bill by significantly shortening the period in which elections are held after a union requests an election (from the traditional 42 days to approximately 10 days). The rationale behind such a move is that while card checks obviate traditional democratic principles, shortened periods for union elections will permit unions to operate stealthily and curtail management's options for presenting its own case of why workers should not join unions. It is obvious that the significantly shortened election period is intended to increase the current success rate of union organizing efforts.
The revised version of EFCA will still provide for huge fines (up to $20,000 per violation) for any employer that violates the National Labor Relations Act (NLRA) during an organizing drive or during negotiations for a first contract. EFCA also will continue to mandate binding arbitration for those items that management and the union cannot agree upon in negotiating that first contract. In effect, government arbitrators will impose a labor relations contract on companies that cannot reach agreement with new unions.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
There is no efficient market for the sale of bankruptcy assets. Inefficient markets yield a transactional drag, potentially dampening the ability of debtors and trustees to maximize value for creditors. This article identifies ways in which investors may more easily discover bankruptcy asset sales.
Why is it that those who are best skilled at advocating for others are ill-equipped at advocating for their own skills and what to do about it?
“Baseball arbitration” refers to the process used in Major League Baseball in which if an eligible player's representative and the club ownership cannot reach a compensation agreement through negotiation, each party enters a final submission and during a formal hearing each side — player and management — presents its case and then the designated panel of arbitrators chooses one of the salary bids with no other result being allowed. This method has become increasingly popular even beyond the sport of baseball.
The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.
Active reading comprises many daily tasks lawyers engage in, including highlighting, annotating, note taking, comparing and searching texts. It demands more than flipping or turning pages.