Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

The 'Revised' Employee Free Choice Act

By Michael Pepperman

Over the past several months, behind-the-scenes “legislative wrangling” has led to several proposed modifications to the poorly titled Employee Free Choice Act (“EFCA”), a bill currently pending in both the House and Senate. These modifications apparently will result in the elimination from EFCA of the “undemocratic” provisions concerning card check (as the sole way to determine if employees want a union) and the restoration of secret ballot elections as the primary means of determining if employees desire union representation. In doing so, however, legislators will likely modify the bill by significantly shortening the period in which elections are held after a union requests an election (from the traditional 42 days to approximately 10 days). The rationale behind such a move is that while card checks obviate traditional democratic principles, shortened periods for union elections will permit unions to operate stealthily and curtail management's options for presenting its own case of why workers should not join unions. It is obvious that the significantly shortened election period is intended to increase the current success rate of union organizing efforts.

The revised version of EFCA will still provide for huge fines (up to $20,000 per violation) for any employer that violates the National Labor Relations Act (NLRA) during an organizing drive or during negotiations for a first contract. EFCA also will continue to mandate binding arbitration for those items that management and the union cannot agree upon in negotiating that first contract. In effect, government arbitrators will impose a labor relations contract on companies that cannot reach agreement with new unions.

This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only

  • Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
  • Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
  • Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts

For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473

Read These Next
Bankruptcy Sales: Finding a Diamond In the Rough Image

There is no efficient market for the sale of bankruptcy assets. Inefficient markets yield a transactional drag, potentially dampening the ability of debtors and trustees to maximize value for creditors. This article identifies ways in which investors may more easily discover bankruptcy asset sales.

Judge Rules Shaquille O'Neal Will Face Securities Lawsuit for Promotion, Sale of NFTs Image

A federal district court in Miami, FL, has ruled that former National Basketball Association star Shaquille O'Neal will have to face a lawsuit over his promotion of unregistered securities in the form of cryptocurrency tokens and that he was a "seller" of these unregistered securities.

Removing Restrictive Covenants In New York Image

In Rockwell v. Despart, the New York Supreme Court, Third Department, recently revisited a recurring question: When may a landowner seek judicial removal of a covenant restricting use of her land?

Why So Many Great Lawyers Stink at Business Development and What Law Firms Are Doing About It Image

Why is it that those who are best skilled at advocating for others are ill-equipped at advocating for their own skills and what to do about it?

Blockchain Domains: New Developments for Brand Owners Image

Blockchain domain names offer decentralized alternatives to traditional DNS-based domain names, promising enhanced security, privacy and censorship resistance. However, these benefits come with significant challenges, particularly for brand owners seeking to protect their trademarks in these new digital spaces.