Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%
Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Classifying Personal Injury Settlements in the Second Department
In article in last month's issue of this newsletter discussed the facts of the recent case of Howe v. Howe, ___ A.D.3d ___, ___ N.Y.S.2d ____, 2009 WL 3136332 (2d Dept. 2009), and its outcome in the Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department. The case addressed several important issues concerning the classification of personal injury awards and disability benefits in a divorce action. It also dealt with the quantum of evidence required to show that an asset should be treated as economic, rather than disability, compensation.
There are some important lessons matrimonial attorneys practicing in the Second Department should take from this case. Let's explore some of them.
Why So Many Great Lawyers Stink at Business Development and What Law Firms Are Doing About It
Why is it that those who are best skilled at advocating for others are ill-equipped at advocating for their own skills and what to do about it?
Bankruptcy Sales: Finding a Diamond In the Rough
There is no efficient market for the sale of bankruptcy assets. Inefficient markets yield a transactional drag, potentially dampening the ability of debtors and trustees to maximize value for creditors. This article identifies ways in which investors may more easily discover bankruptcy asset sales.
The DOJ's Corporate Enforcement Policy: One Year Later
The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.
A Lawyer's System for Active Reading
Active reading comprises many daily tasks lawyers engage in, including highlighting, annotating, note taking, comparing and searching texts. It demands more than flipping or turning pages.
Protecting Innovation in the Cyber World from Patent Trolls
With trillions of dollars to keep watch over, the last thing we need is the distraction of costly litigation brought on by patent assertion entities (PAEs or "patent trolls"), companies that don't make any products but instead seek royalties by asserting their patents against those who do make products.