Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
New York is one if the very few U.S. jurisdictions, other than those states that have actually authorized same-sex marriage (Connecticut, Iowa, Maine, Massachusetts, New Hampshire and Vermont), to have given full faith and credit to same-sex marriages validly performed in other jurisdictions. Now that New York courts have explicitly recognized same-sex marriages validly performed elsewhere ' both in those U.S. states that permit such marriages and in non-U.S. jurisdictions such as Canada (see, e.g., Beth R. v. Donna M, 19 Misc. 3d 724 (Sup. Ct. N.Y. Cty. 2008) and C.M. v. C.C., 21 Misc. 3d 926 (Sup. Ct. N.Y. Cty. 2008)) ' we can expect a growing number of same-sex couples, validly married somewhere else, to follow their heterosexual counterparts into New York's divorce courts.
For several reasons, however, same-sex divorce involves complexities not usually seen in more traditional matrimonial actions. These complexities arise because of the interplay of state law, which typically governs familial relationships, and U.S. federal law, which substantially determines the tax and pension consequences of marriage and divorce. The federal Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) denies spousal status to same-sex couples, even if their marriages are valid, and thus such couples cannot be treated as married for income-tax and other federal purposes. In addition, DOMA explicitly permits states to deny full faith and credit to the actions of other jurisdictions with respect to same-sex married couples. Therefore, the portability of New York same-sex divorce settlements and decrees, along with provisions for child custody, support and spousal maintenance, to other states is extremely problematic.
The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.
The parameters set forth in the DOJ's memorandum have implications not only for the government's evaluation of compliance programs in the context of criminal charging decisions, but also for how defense counsel structure their conference-room advocacy seeking declinations or lesser sanctions in both criminal and civil investigations.
This article discusses the practical and policy reasons for the use of DPAs and NPAs in white-collar criminal investigations, and considers the NDAA's new reporting provision and its relationship with other efforts to enhance transparency in DOJ decision-making.
There is no efficient market for the sale of bankruptcy assets. Inefficient markets yield a transactional drag, potentially dampening the ability of debtors and trustees to maximize value for creditors. This article identifies ways in which investors may more easily discover bankruptcy asset sales.
Active reading comprises many daily tasks lawyers engage in, including highlighting, annotating, note taking, comparing and searching texts. It demands more than flipping or turning pages.