Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
One of the most frustrating and wasteful legal expenses for a medical device or pharmaceutical manufacturer is the cost of defending against claims where its product is ultimately found not to be involved. This happens where cases are pleaded to include the defendant along with multiple other manufacturers of the same or similar products. Such general pleading tactics in toxic tort cases have become the status quo for many plaintiffs' firms nationwide, where counsel look to “take the easy way out” by simply naming all competing manufacturers of a product rather than doing their investigative homework up front on the issue of product identification. Medical product manufacturers consider this “shotgun” approach to litigation abusive and harassing, and they have long chafed against having to defend against claims that do not involve their products.
Mass Tort Cases
The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.
The parameters set forth in the DOJ's memorandum have implications not only for the government's evaluation of compliance programs in the context of criminal charging decisions, but also for how defense counsel structure their conference-room advocacy seeking declinations or lesser sanctions in both criminal and civil investigations.
This article discusses the practical and policy reasons for the use of DPAs and NPAs in white-collar criminal investigations, and considers the NDAA's new reporting provision and its relationship with other efforts to enhance transparency in DOJ decision-making.
There is no efficient market for the sale of bankruptcy assets. Inefficient markets yield a transactional drag, potentially dampening the ability of debtors and trustees to maximize value for creditors. This article identifies ways in which investors may more easily discover bankruptcy asset sales.
Active reading comprises many daily tasks lawyers engage in, including highlighting, annotating, note taking, comparing and searching texts. It demands more than flipping or turning pages.