Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%
Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
'Prejudice'
It is fairly well established in many courts across the United States that “late notice” of a claim under an occurrence-based commercial general liability (“CGL”) policy presents a problem for insureds only when it “actually” and “substantially prejudices” an insurer. Many courts also have held that insurers that seek to rely on a late notice defense may do so only if they themselves can prove the “actual” and “substantial prejudice” they suffered. In light of that standard, insurers appear to face high hurdles if they rely on notice issues to avoid coverage. At the very least, it seems that the question of prejudice is highly factual and thus should be preserved for a jury to decide.
Insurers, however, often seek to avoid jury consideration of the issue. Instead, these insurers file motions for summary judgment on the issues of late notice and substantial prejudice. In their motions, the insurers argue that not only was an insured's notice untimely, but also that the court can rule, as a matter of law, without any consideration of the facts, that the prejudice was “actual” and “substantial.” Courts should not take the bait. The late notice defense is riddled with factual issues: 1) Was the notice in fact “late”? 2) Did the insurer suffer prejudice? 3) Was that prejudice “actual” and “substantial”? Thus, by its nature, the late notice issue in the vast majority of cases should go to the jury. Courts should reject insurer efforts to have the issue decided as a matter of law on summary judgment.
The DOJ's Corporate Enforcement Policy: One Year Later
The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.
Use of Deferred Prosecution Agreements In White Collar Investigations
This article discusses the practical and policy reasons for the use of DPAs and NPAs in white-collar criminal investigations, and considers the NDAA's new reporting provision and its relationship with other efforts to enhance transparency in DOJ decision-making.
The DOJ's New Parameters for Evaluating Corporate Compliance Programs
The parameters set forth in the DOJ's memorandum have implications not only for the government's evaluation of compliance programs in the context of criminal charging decisions, but also for how defense counsel structure their conference-room advocacy seeking declinations or lesser sanctions in both criminal and civil investigations.
How AI Has Affected PR
When we consider how the use of AI affects legal PR and communications, we have to look at it as an industrywide global phenomenon. A recent online conference provided an overview of the latest AI trends in public relations, and specifically, the impact of AI on communications. Here are some of the key points and takeaways from several of the speakers, who provided current best practices, tips, concerns and case studies.
CLE Shouldn't Be the Only Mandatory Training for Attorneys
Each stage of an attorney's career offers opportunities for a curriculum that addresses both the individual's and the firm's need to drive success.