Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%
Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Economic Stimulus and False Claims Act Liability
Over the past several months, most of us have seen the literal signs of government stimulus alongside the highways and byways we travel ' “Putting America to Work, This Project Funded by the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act,” reads a typical placard. The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (“ARRA”) encompasses a number of government programs designed to stimulate the economy, including “Payments for Specified Energy Projects In Lieu of Tax Credits” (PILOTCs), the “Community Development Financial Institutions Fund,” the “New Markets Tax Credit,” grants to states for low income housing projects in lieu of low income housing tax credit allocations, Department of Energy loan guarantees, and others.
Given the current economic climate, there has been strong interest in these programs. Due to the slowdown of general commercial activity, many stimulus applicants and recipients are companies that have traditionally done little, if any, business with the government. Setting aside the contentious issue of whether stimulus activities are good for the economy at large, it is important that applicants for, and recipients of, stimulus funds realize that participation in these programs could result not only in significant benefits, but also in exposure to legal liability. The peculiarities of Government procurement and grant programs are not novel, but could be beyond the expectation of a company used to doing business solely in the private sector.
This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
- Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
- Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
- Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
The DOJ's Corporate Enforcement Policy: One Year Later
The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.
Use of Deferred Prosecution Agreements In White Collar Investigations
This article discusses the practical and policy reasons for the use of DPAs and NPAs in white-collar criminal investigations, and considers the NDAA's new reporting provision and its relationship with other efforts to enhance transparency in DOJ decision-making.
How AI Has Affected PR
When we consider how the use of AI affects legal PR and communications, we have to look at it as an industrywide global phenomenon. A recent online conference provided an overview of the latest AI trends in public relations, and specifically, the impact of AI on communications. Here are some of the key points and takeaways from several of the speakers, who provided current best practices, tips, concerns and case studies.
The DOJ's New Parameters for Evaluating Corporate Compliance Programs
The parameters set forth in the DOJ's memorandum have implications not only for the government's evaluation of compliance programs in the context of criminal charging decisions, but also for how defense counsel structure their conference-room advocacy seeking declinations or lesser sanctions in both criminal and civil investigations.