Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Wealthy taxpayers have commonly used trusts to achieve a variety of tax, estate, asset and divorce protection, and other goals. What might loosely be called “traditional” trusts, typically done by a parent or other benefactor for a child to safeguard funds for college, and the insurance trust, which is nearly ubiquitous in estate planning, have been the most common types of trusts. These trusts present a number of issues to matrimonial practitioners. More recently, grantor trusts, and variations of them such as self-settled domestic asset protection trusts (“DAPTS”) or dynasty trusts targeted to plan for the generation-skipping transfer (“GST”) tax, have become more common. These present more complex and thorny issues in a divorce context. Matrimonial practitioners need to have some understanding of common long-standing trust techniques and some of the new ones in order to advise clients through a divorce involving such trusts.
The following two-part discussion begins with the simplest of trusts and progresses through more sophisticated trust techniques, highlighting the issues that may arise at each phase. The simplicity of the progression below might be more understandable framework for non-estate planners forced to address these matters. Trusts can be assembled, like an erector set, in myriad ways, each with its own nuances. To simplify the discussion, assume that you, the reader, represent the husband (“Husband”), and that the wife is involved with the particular trust in question as beneficiary, grantor, etc. (“Wife”). The purpose of this article is to raise practical ideas and considerations for matrimonial practitioners to consider and not to provide an analysis of current matrimonial case law on these matters.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.
When we consider how the use of AI affects legal PR and communications, we have to look at it as an industrywide global phenomenon. A recent online conference provided an overview of the latest AI trends in public relations, and specifically, the impact of AI on communications. Here are some of the key points and takeaways from several of the speakers, who provided current best practices, tips, concerns and case studies.
This article discusses the practical and policy reasons for the use of DPAs and NPAs in white-collar criminal investigations, and considers the NDAA's new reporting provision and its relationship with other efforts to enhance transparency in DOJ decision-making.
The parameters set forth in the DOJ's memorandum have implications not only for the government's evaluation of compliance programs in the context of criminal charging decisions, but also for how defense counsel structure their conference-room advocacy seeking declinations or lesser sanctions in both criminal and civil investigations.
Each stage of an attorney's career offers opportunities for a curriculum that addresses both the individual's and the firm's need to drive success.