Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Wealthy taxpayers have commonly used trusts to achieve a variety of tax, estate, asset and divorce protection, and other goals. What might loosely be called “traditional” trusts, typically done by a parent or other benefactor for a child to safeguard funds for college, and the insurance trust, which is nearly ubiquitous in estate planning, have been the most common types of trusts. These trusts present a number of issues to matrimonial practitioners. More recently, grantor trusts, and variations of them such as self-settled domestic asset protection trusts (“DAPTS”) or dynasty trusts targeted to plan for the generation-skipping transfer (“GST”) tax, have become more common. These present more complex and thorny issues in a divorce context. Matrimonial practitioners need to have some understanding of common long-standing trust techniques and some of the new ones in order to advise clients through a divorce involving such trusts.
The following two-part discussion begins with the simplest of trusts and progresses through more sophisticated trust techniques, highlighting the issues that may arise at each phase. The simplicity of the progression below might be more understandable framework for non-estate planners forced to address these matters. Trusts can be assembled, like an erector set, in myriad ways, each with its own nuances. To simplify the discussion, assume that you, the reader, represent the husband (“Husband”), and that the wife is involved with the particular trust in question as beneficiary, grantor, etc. (“Wife”). The purpose of this article is to raise practical ideas and considerations for matrimonial practitioners to consider and not to provide an analysis of current matrimonial case law on these matters.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
There is no efficient market for the sale of bankruptcy assets. Inefficient markets yield a transactional drag, potentially dampening the ability of debtors and trustees to maximize value for creditors. This article identifies ways in which investors may more easily discover bankruptcy asset sales.
A federal district court in Miami, FL, has ruled that former National Basketball Association star Shaquille O'Neal will have to face a lawsuit over his promotion of unregistered securities in the form of cryptocurrency tokens and that he was a "seller" of these unregistered securities.
In Rockwell v. Despart, the New York Supreme Court, Third Department, recently revisited a recurring question: When may a landowner seek judicial removal of a covenant restricting use of her land?
Why is it that those who are best skilled at advocating for others are ill-equipped at advocating for their own skills and what to do about it?
Blockchain domain names offer decentralized alternatives to traditional DNS-based domain names, promising enhanced security, privacy and censorship resistance. However, these benefits come with significant challenges, particularly for brand owners seeking to protect their trademarks in these new digital spaces.