Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Wealthy taxpayers have commonly used trusts to achieve a variety of tax, estate, asset and divorce protection, and other goals. What might loosely be called “traditional” trusts, typically done by a parent or other benefactor for a child to safeguard funds for college, and the insurance trust, which is nearly ubiquitous in estate planning, have been the most common types of trusts. These trusts present a number of issues to matrimonial practitioners. More recently, grantor trusts, and variations of them such as self-settled domestic asset protection trusts (“DAPTS”) or dynasty trusts targeted to plan for the generation-skipping transfer (“GST”) tax, have become more common. These present more complex and thorny issues in a divorce context. Matrimonial practitioners need to have some understanding of common long-standing trust techniques and some of the new ones in order to advise clients through a divorce involving such trusts.
The following two-part discussion begins with the simplest of trusts and progresses through more sophisticated trust techniques, highlighting the issues that may arise at each phase. The simplicity of the progression below might be more understandable framework for non-estate planners forced to address these matters. Trusts can be assembled, like an erector set, in myriad ways, each with its own nuances. To simplify the discussion, assume that you, the reader, represent the husband (“Husband”), and that the wife is involved with the particular trust in question as beneficiary, grantor, etc. (“Wife”). The purpose of this article is to raise practical ideas and considerations for matrimonial practitioners to consider and not to provide an analysis of current matrimonial case law on these matters.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
There's current litigation in the ongoing Beach Boys litigation saga. A lawsuit filed in 2019 against Nevada residents Mike Love and his wife Jacquelyne in the U.S. District Court for the District of Nevada that alleges inaccurate payment by the Loves under the retainer agreement and seeks $84.5 million in damages.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
The real property transfer tax does not apply to all leases, and understanding the tax rules of the applicable jurisdiction can allow parties to plan ahead to avoid unnecessary tax liability.