Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

Worker Misclassification to Receive Heightened Scrutiny

By Joel W. Rice and Brian K. LaFratta
January 28, 2010

Over the past year, federal and state governmental agencies have signaled their intent to more seriously investigate the misclassification of employees as independent contractors. For various reasons, employers often find it desirable to classify certain workers as independent contractors. Independent contractors are not covered by most employment laws because they are not employees. Additionally, classification of individuals as independent contractors deprives federal and state governments of tax revenue for such individuals, as they are not subject to payroll taxes. For instance, the federal government lost an estimated $34.7 billion in tax revenue between 1996 and 2004 due to such classification of workers. While there are instances where individuals are legitimately classified as independent contractors, such individuals are often in fact misclassified employees. Motivated by budget shortfalls and declining tax revenue, state and federal agencies have begun to aggressively police such instances of misclassification in an effort to recover lost revenue. Penalties for misclassification are severe and can put a company out of business.

Independent Contractor Versus Employee

This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only

  • Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
  • Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
  • Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts

For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473

Read These Next
The DOJ's Corporate Enforcement Policy: One Year Later Image

The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.

The Bankruptcy Hotline Image

Recent cases of importance to your practice.

Use of Deferred Prosecution Agreements In White Collar Investigations Image

This article discusses the practical and policy reasons for the use of DPAs and NPAs in white-collar criminal investigations, and considers the NDAA's new reporting provision and its relationship with other efforts to enhance transparency in DOJ decision-making.

How AI Has Affected PR Image

When we consider how the use of AI affects legal PR and communications, we have to look at it as an industrywide global phenomenon. A recent online conference provided an overview of the latest AI trends in public relations, and specifically, the impact of AI on communications. Here are some of the key points and takeaways from several of the speakers, who provided current best practices, tips, concerns and case studies.

The DOJ's New Parameters for Evaluating Corporate Compliance Programs Image

The parameters set forth in the DOJ's memorandum have implications not only for the government's evaluation of compliance programs in the context of criminal charging decisions, but also for how defense counsel structure their conference-room advocacy seeking declinations or lesser sanctions in both criminal and civil investigations.