Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Film Studio Wins Tax Credit Case
The Court of Appeal of Louisiana, First Circuit, affirmed that a production company continued to qualify for state motion-picture tax credits. Red Stick Studio Development L.L.C. v. State of Louisiana, 2009 CA 1347. Louisiana allowed investor tax credits for productions and their infrastructures. Section '3(C) of Act 456 of the 2007 Regular Session of the Legislature, La. R.S. 47:6007, grandfathered infrastructure projects for which applications for pre-certification or initial certification had been filed by Aug. 1, 2007. Red Stick submitted its application on Feb. 27, 2007. The state then issued an Initial Certification Letter that stated “the applicant shall have until Jan. 1, 2010, to earn tax credits on this project.” Red Stick filed suit, challenging the letter's language, and the trial court ruled for the studio. The Court of Appeal ruled: “We agree with the trial court's determination that the words 'qualify for' as they are used in Section 3(C) mean that an application filed on or before Aug. 1, 2007, must 1) apply for and receive its Initial Certification Letter and 2) spend a minimum of 20[%] or $10 million of the total base investment provided for in the Initial Certification Letter that is unique to film production infrastructure before Jan. 1, 2010. Thereafter, it is qualified to earn 40[%] infrastructure tax credits for the life of the project. The law is to be applied as written with no further interpretation made in search of the intent of the legislature.”
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.
This article discusses the practical and policy reasons for the use of DPAs and NPAs in white-collar criminal investigations, and considers the NDAA's new reporting provision and its relationship with other efforts to enhance transparency in DOJ decision-making.
The parameters set forth in the DOJ's memorandum have implications not only for the government's evaluation of compliance programs in the context of criminal charging decisions, but also for how defense counsel structure their conference-room advocacy seeking declinations or lesser sanctions in both criminal and civil investigations.
When we consider how the use of AI affects legal PR and communications, we have to look at it as an industrywide global phenomenon. A recent online conference provided an overview of the latest AI trends in public relations, and specifically, the impact of AI on communications. Here are some of the key points and takeaways from several of the speakers, who provided current best practices, tips, concerns and case studies.