Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Talk of e-mail management has been ubiquitous in recent years, but many law firms still have not made significant progress. For a records and information management professional, “e-mail management” refers to controlling valuable record content from the point of creation on, and not just keeping Exchange servers running smoothly.
Organizations achieving true e-mail management are looking toward full compliance ' either by categorizing e-mails as client/matter communication or treating them as transitory records that will be destroyed within a relatively short period of time. For many firms, e-mail management has meant keeping their mail delivery systems online, avoiding performance issues, and regularly backing up content for disaster recovery.
e-Mail archiving and other management tools are essential to keeping Exchange servers running in the current overloaded environments, but these solutions do not fix the problems surrounding accessing, utilizing and managing information in a collaborative environment.
e-Mail presents volume concerns never seen in any other format of communication. This medium has been embraced primarily as a productivity tool even though it is poorly suited to collaboration and long-term content management. The fact that e-mail existed for so long outside of firm Enterprise Content Management solutions and the informal nature of the medium has contributed to inappropriate usage. Addressing this problem in any organization requires a mixture of technology and process innovations. The following suggestions outline strategies to reduce the burden of e-mail management inside law firms, focusing first on processes and engaging end users. Some may present significant cultural changes, but these issues must be addressed in order to begin to manage e-mail.
e-Mail Emergency Response Unit
Most firms have made no dedicated effort to address e-mail management outside of technology considerations. Technology will be discussed later in this article, but the following recommendations assume that the firm has a viable repository for e-mails where they can be easily moved in their native format. Firms must focus on development of policies and procedures, modes of enforcement and educational programs to address e-mail management. The development of a task force and investment in resources to change a firm's e-mail culture must be addressed. Lawyers and staff typically had administrative resources to rely on when managing physical documents, so they should have access to similar resources in the electronic realm.
Reducing Volume Going Forward
The sheer volume of e-mail represents one of the biggest problems that most users face. Many accept this as a necessary evil of our connected, digital age. Attorneys do not have time to manage hundreds of e-mails per day. The following tactics can be employed to reduce the volume of e-mail. While many suggestions follow basic common sense, changing the usage of e-mail in your organization is not easy.
Technology
A technology solution is a necessary part of the answer to managing e-mail. IT departments have been asked to focus on issues of dependability and disaster recovery. Many of these solutions are contrary to good records management techniques. Tape backup of e-mail servers, for instance, provides a quick way to restore e-mail history in the event of a catastrophic failure of the system. Yet, content is stored on tapes in a manner that makes the backup more efficient, not by content or business value. This type of backup is not designed for exploration, discovery or selective restoration, yet firms are frequently asked to get these results from their “e-mail management” software solutions. Some aspects of the “perfect” e-mail management solution are discussed below.
These are some basic suggestions for making e-mail management less of a burden in your firm. Only a combination of people, processes and technology will really make a difference in managing this content compliantly.
Talk of e-mail management has been ubiquitous in recent years, but many law firms still have not made significant progress. For a records and information management professional, “e-mail management” refers to controlling valuable record content from the point of creation on, and not just keeping Exchange servers running smoothly.
Organizations achieving true e-mail management are looking toward full compliance ' either by categorizing e-mails as client/matter communication or treating them as transitory records that will be destroyed within a relatively short period of time. For many firms, e-mail management has meant keeping their mail delivery systems online, avoiding performance issues, and regularly backing up content for disaster recovery.
e-Mail archiving and other management tools are essential to keeping Exchange servers running in the current overloaded environments, but these solutions do not fix the problems surrounding accessing, utilizing and managing information in a collaborative environment.
e-Mail presents volume concerns never seen in any other format of communication. This medium has been embraced primarily as a productivity tool even though it is poorly suited to collaboration and long-term content management. The fact that e-mail existed for so long outside of firm Enterprise Content Management solutions and the informal nature of the medium has contributed to inappropriate usage. Addressing this problem in any organization requires a mixture of technology and process innovations. The following suggestions outline strategies to reduce the burden of e-mail management inside law firms, focusing first on processes and engaging end users. Some may present significant cultural changes, but these issues must be addressed in order to begin to manage e-mail.
e-Mail Emergency Response Unit
Most firms have made no dedicated effort to address e-mail management outside of technology considerations. Technology will be discussed later in this article, but the following recommendations assume that the firm has a viable repository for e-mails where they can be easily moved in their native format. Firms must focus on development of policies and procedures, modes of enforcement and educational programs to address e-mail management. The development of a task force and investment in resources to change a firm's e-mail culture must be addressed. Lawyers and staff typically had administrative resources to rely on when managing physical documents, so they should have access to similar resources in the electronic realm.
Reducing Volume Going Forward
The sheer volume of e-mail represents one of the biggest problems that most users face. Many accept this as a necessary evil of our connected, digital age. Attorneys do not have time to manage hundreds of e-mails per day. The following tactics can be employed to reduce the volume of e-mail. While many suggestions follow basic common sense, changing the usage of e-mail in your organization is not easy.
Technology
A technology solution is a necessary part of the answer to managing e-mail. IT departments have been asked to focus on issues of dependability and disaster recovery. Many of these solutions are contrary to good records management techniques. Tape backup of e-mail servers, for instance, provides a quick way to restore e-mail history in the event of a catastrophic failure of the system. Yet, content is stored on tapes in a manner that makes the backup more efficient, not by content or business value. This type of backup is not designed for exploration, discovery or selective restoration, yet firms are frequently asked to get these results from their “e-mail management” software solutions. Some aspects of the “perfect” e-mail management solution are discussed below.
These are some basic suggestions for making e-mail management less of a burden in your firm. Only a combination of people, processes and technology will really make a difference in managing this content compliantly.
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
Possession of real property is a matter of physical fact. Having the right or legal entitlement to possession is not "possession," possession is "the fact of having or holding property in one's power." That power means having physical dominion and control over the property.
In 1987, a unanimous Court of Appeals reaffirmed the vitality of the "stranger to the deed" rule, which holds that if a grantor executes a deed to a grantee purporting to create an easement in a third party, the easement is invalid. Daniello v. Wagner, decided by the Second Department on November 29th, makes it clear that not all grantors (or their lawyers) have received the Court of Appeals' message, suggesting that the rule needs re-examination.