Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%
Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Forum Selection Clause Applies To Merged TV Company
The U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York decided that a forum selection clause in a television broadcast agreement applied to a company within which the original signatory broadcaster later was merged. Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer Studios Inc. v. Canal Distribution S.A.S., 07 Civ. 2918(DAB).
In 1996, MGM entered into an agreement to provide pay-TV rights in movies and TV programs to TPS Societe en Nom Collectif (TPS), a French satellite network. In case of disputes, the agreement's forum selection clause cited New York. The contract's initial five-year term was subsequently extended for an additional five years to Dec. 31, 2006. The extension agreement gave MGM the right to extend the license for yet another five years, if TPS merged with another company. TPS did merge with CanalSatellite S.A. (CANALSAT), its only competitor, into Canal Distribution. The TPS and CanalSatellite owners announced the merger would be completed in November 2006, though it was approved in January 2007. In September 2006, MGM initially notified TPS and then later Canal Distribution that MGM would exercise its license extension option. But the French parties refused to perform, and MGM sued the Canal Distribution owners in New York federal court for breach of contract and tortious interference with contract.
This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
- Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
- Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
- Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
The DOJ's Corporate Enforcement Policy: One Year Later
The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.
Use of Deferred Prosecution Agreements In White Collar Investigations
This article discusses the practical and policy reasons for the use of DPAs and NPAs in white-collar criminal investigations, and considers the NDAA's new reporting provision and its relationship with other efforts to enhance transparency in DOJ decision-making.
The DOJ's New Parameters for Evaluating Corporate Compliance Programs
The parameters set forth in the DOJ's memorandum have implications not only for the government's evaluation of compliance programs in the context of criminal charging decisions, but also for how defense counsel structure their conference-room advocacy seeking declinations or lesser sanctions in both criminal and civil investigations.
How AI Has Affected PR
When we consider how the use of AI affects legal PR and communications, we have to look at it as an industrywide global phenomenon. A recent online conference provided an overview of the latest AI trends in public relations, and specifically, the impact of AI on communications. Here are some of the key points and takeaways from several of the speakers, who provided current best practices, tips, concerns and case studies.