Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
The U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York decided that a forum selection clause in a television broadcast agreement applied to a company within which the original signatory broadcaster later was merged. Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer Studios Inc. v. Canal Distribution S.A.S., 07 Civ. 2918(DAB).
In 1996, MGM entered into an agreement to provide pay-TV rights in movies and TV programs to TPS Societe en Nom Collectif (TPS), a French satellite network. In case of disputes, the agreement's forum selection clause cited New York. The contract's initial five-year term was subsequently extended for an additional five years to Dec. 31, 2006. The extension agreement gave MGM the right to extend the license for yet another five years, if TPS merged with another company. TPS did merge with CanalSatellite S.A. (CANALSAT), its only competitor, into Canal Distribution. The TPS and CanalSatellite owners announced the merger would be completed in November 2006, though it was approved in January 2007. In September 2006, MGM initially notified TPS and then later Canal Distribution that MGM would exercise its license extension option. But the French parties refused to perform, and MGM sued the Canal Distribution owners in New York federal court for breach of contract and tortious interference with contract.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
There is no efficient market for the sale of bankruptcy assets. Inefficient markets yield a transactional drag, potentially dampening the ability of debtors and trustees to maximize value for creditors. This article identifies ways in which investors may more easily discover bankruptcy asset sales.
Summary Judgment Denied Defendant in Declaratory Action by Producer of To Kill a Mockingbird Broadway Play Seeking Amateur Theatrical Rights
“Baseball arbitration” refers to the process used in Major League Baseball in which if an eligible player's representative and the club ownership cannot reach a compensation agreement through negotiation, each party enters a final submission and during a formal hearing each side — player and management — presents its case and then the designated panel of arbitrators chooses one of the salary bids with no other result being allowed. This method has become increasingly popular even beyond the sport of baseball.
Executives have access to some of the company's most sensitive information, and they're increasingly being targeted by hackers looking to steal company secrets or to perpetrate cybercrimes.
Why is it that those who are best skilled at advocating for others are ill-equipped at advocating for their own skills and what to do about it?