Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

Forum Selection Clause Applies To Merged TV Company

The U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York decided that a forum selection clause in a television broadcast agreement applied to a company within which the original signatory broadcaster later was merged. Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer Studios Inc. v. Canal Distribution S.A.S., 07 Civ. 2918(DAB).

In 1996, MGM entered into an agreement to provide pay-TV rights in movies and TV programs to TPS Societe en Nom Collectif (TPS), a French satellite network. In case of disputes, the agreement's forum selection clause cited New York. The contract's initial five-year term was subsequently extended for an additional five years to Dec. 31, 2006. The extension agreement gave MGM the right to extend the license for yet another five years, if TPS merged with another company. TPS did merge with CanalSatellite S.A. (CANALSAT), its only competitor, into Canal Distribution. The TPS and CanalSatellite owners announced the merger would be completed in November 2006, though it was approved in January 2007. In September 2006, MGM initially notified TPS and then later Canal Distribution that MGM would exercise its license extension option. But the French parties refused to perform, and MGM sued the Canal Distribution owners in New York federal court for breach of contract and tortious interference with contract.

This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only

  • Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
  • Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
  • Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts

For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473

Read These Next
The Article 8 Opt In Image

The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.

Major Differences In UK, U.S. Copyright Laws Image

This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.

Beach Boys Songs Written Decades Ago Triggered Current Quarrel With Lawyers Image

There's current litigation in the ongoing Beach Boys litigation saga. A lawsuit filed in 2019 against Nevada residents Mike Love and his wife Jacquelyne in the U.S. District Court for the District of Nevada that alleges inaccurate payment by the Loves under the retainer agreement and seeks $84.5 million in damages.

Strategy vs. Tactics: Two Sides of a Difficult Coin Image

With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.

Transfer Tax Implications on Real Property Leases Image

The real property transfer tax does not apply to all leases, and understanding the tax rules of the applicable jurisdiction can allow parties to plan ahead to avoid unnecessary tax liability.