Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
A cottage industry developed in the Southern District of New York after the Second Circuit's 2002 decision in Winter Storm Shipping, Ltd. v. TPI, 310 F. 3d 263 (“Winter Storm“) devoted to securing and maintaining pre-judgment attachments of funds-transfer payment orders (more commonly referred to as electronic funds transfers) (“EFTs”) passing through New York banks. The Second Circuit in Winter Storm held such payment orders to be “property” of the “originator” (the transferor of an EFT) notwithstanding that the originator had no account with the intermediary bank. Rule B attachments have also been routinely issued against beneficiaries (transferees) of an EFT, notwithstanding that the beneficiaries, likewise, have no account with the intermediary bank.
Rule B Attachments
There is no efficient market for the sale of bankruptcy assets. Inefficient markets yield a transactional drag, potentially dampening the ability of debtors and trustees to maximize value for creditors. This article identifies ways in which investors may more easily discover bankruptcy asset sales.
A federal district court in Miami, FL, has ruled that former National Basketball Association star Shaquille O'Neal will have to face a lawsuit over his promotion of unregistered securities in the form of cryptocurrency tokens and that he was a "seller" of these unregistered securities.
Why is it that those who are best skilled at advocating for others are ill-equipped at advocating for their own skills and what to do about it?
Blockchain domain names offer decentralized alternatives to traditional DNS-based domain names, promising enhanced security, privacy and censorship resistance. However, these benefits come with significant challenges, particularly for brand owners seeking to protect their trademarks in these new digital spaces.
In Rockwell v. Despart, the New York Supreme Court, Third Department, recently revisited a recurring question: When may a landowner seek judicial removal of a covenant restricting use of her land?