Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Franchisors, like other businesses, should periodically review their insurance policies to make certain that they understand the scope of their existing coverage and to identify (and remedy) any significant gaps in that coverage. Given that franchisors are more frequently finding themselves in the cross-hairs of their franchisees, franchisors should pay particular attention to whether they have coverage for franchisee claims and, if so, the extent of that coverage. Franchisors should not wait until they have become a target to determine whether they have insurance protection.
A federal judge recently held that a franchisor did not have coverage for claims by a former franchisee under a Directors and Officers policy that excluded claims “based upon, arising from, or in any way related to any Claim made by or on behalf of any franchisee of the Company in any capacity.” (Emphasis added.) The court determined that an endorsement to the D&O policy excluded coverage regardless of whether the claim was made by a current or former franchisee. Alvord Investments, LLC v. The Hartford Financial Services Group, Inc. et al., 660 F. Supp. 2d 850 (W.D. Tenn. 2009).
There is no efficient market for the sale of bankruptcy assets. Inefficient markets yield a transactional drag, potentially dampening the ability of debtors and trustees to maximize value for creditors. This article identifies ways in which investors may more easily discover bankruptcy asset sales.
A federal district court in Miami, FL, has ruled that former National Basketball Association star Shaquille O'Neal will have to face a lawsuit over his promotion of unregistered securities in the form of cryptocurrency tokens and that he was a "seller" of these unregistered securities.
Why is it that those who are best skilled at advocating for others are ill-equipped at advocating for their own skills and what to do about it?
Blockchain domain names offer decentralized alternatives to traditional DNS-based domain names, promising enhanced security, privacy and censorship resistance. However, these benefits come with significant challenges, particularly for brand owners seeking to protect their trademarks in these new digital spaces.
In Rockwell v. Despart, the New York Supreme Court, Third Department, recently revisited a recurring question: When may a landowner seek judicial removal of a covenant restricting use of her land?