Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Consider the following scenario: A defendant doctor in a medical malpractice case has failed to comply with his discovery obligations. As a result, his answer is stricken and the case proceeds to an inquest on the issue of damages. During the inquest, the defendant attempts to introduce evidence that the plaintiff's injuries were not caused by the doctor's negligence, but by another factor, in whole or in part; namely, the plaintiff's pre-existing medical condition. Plaintiff objects, claiming that the issue of causation was determined by the default. How should the court rule? Should the defendant be permitted to present such evidence, or is he deemed to have admitted, by virtue of his stricken answer, that his negligence was the sole cause of plaintiff's injuries?
New York Law
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
There is no efficient market for the sale of bankruptcy assets. Inefficient markets yield a transactional drag, potentially dampening the ability of debtors and trustees to maximize value for creditors. This article identifies ways in which investors may more easily discover bankruptcy asset sales.
A federal district court in Miami, FL, has ruled that former National Basketball Association star Shaquille O'Neal will have to face a lawsuit over his promotion of unregistered securities in the form of cryptocurrency tokens and that he was a "seller" of these unregistered securities.
Why is it that those who are best skilled at advocating for others are ill-equipped at advocating for their own skills and what to do about it?
Blockchain domain names offer decentralized alternatives to traditional DNS-based domain names, promising enhanced security, privacy and censorship resistance. However, these benefits come with significant challenges, particularly for brand owners seeking to protect their trademarks in these new digital spaces.
In Rockwell v. Despart, the New York Supreme Court, Third Department, recently revisited a recurring question: When may a landowner seek judicial removal of a covenant restricting use of her land?