Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
When handling the divorce of a couple that includes at least one military member or retiree, special concerns must be addressed. These include some obvious things, such as child custody and visitation schedules when one party may be deployed overseas or relocated to a distant base. Another well-known problem for family law attorneys is the complications posed by the laws related to military retirement and service-related disability benefits. Even when a lawyer is aware of the complications that can arise, attempts to protect the civilian party's rights to a portion of the service member's retirement may go awry. Recent cases in Alaska and Texas illustrate the problems that attempts to work around the laws can cause.
This article looks at what happened with these cases, as well as an older case out of New York.
There is no efficient market for the sale of bankruptcy assets. Inefficient markets yield a transactional drag, potentially dampening the ability of debtors and trustees to maximize value for creditors. This article identifies ways in which investors may more easily discover bankruptcy asset sales.
A federal district court in Miami, FL, has ruled that former National Basketball Association star Shaquille O'Neal will have to face a lawsuit over his promotion of unregistered securities in the form of cryptocurrency tokens and that he was a "seller" of these unregistered securities.
Why is it that those who are best skilled at advocating for others are ill-equipped at advocating for their own skills and what to do about it?
Blockchain domain names offer decentralized alternatives to traditional DNS-based domain names, promising enhanced security, privacy and censorship resistance. However, these benefits come with significant challenges, particularly for brand owners seeking to protect their trademarks in these new digital spaces.
In Rockwell v. Despart, the New York Supreme Court, Third Department, recently revisited a recurring question: When may a landowner seek judicial removal of a covenant restricting use of her land?