Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
It's no secret that 2009 was a year where many law firms began to intensively focus on their finances. Unlike in the past, it is not just firm leadership taking a close look at the firm's books these days. The focus on finances has extended to law firm partners, involving a wider audience than the managing partner and management committee. In firms grappling with the severity of the economic crisis, legal management consultants, such as the author's firm, have noticed many encountering unexpected challenges when communicating the firms' financial results with the wider partnership. In some firms, for example, many partners have widely varying perspectives on practice profitability, office profitability, utilization, expenses, and overhead allocation. We have even found some partners from the same firm referencing different values for supposedly the same performance metric.
We believe most financial misunderstandings and shortcomings can be avoided if firm management were to use some fairly straightforward communication techniques with their general partnership. In this article we have compiled a few considerations for a law firm's head-of-finance (CFOs, EDs, etc.) to contemplate when communicating with his or her respective partnership.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.
This article discusses the practical and policy reasons for the use of DPAs and NPAs in white-collar criminal investigations, and considers the NDAA's new reporting provision and its relationship with other efforts to enhance transparency in DOJ decision-making.
The parameters set forth in the DOJ's memorandum have implications not only for the government's evaluation of compliance programs in the context of criminal charging decisions, but also for how defense counsel structure their conference-room advocacy seeking declinations or lesser sanctions in both criminal and civil investigations.
Each stage of an attorney's career offers opportunities for a curriculum that addresses both the individual's and the firm's need to drive success.
A defendant in a patent infringement suit may, during discovery and prior to a <i>Markman</i> hearing, compel the plaintiff to produce claim charts, claim constructions, and element-by-element infringement analyses.