Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%
Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Defending the Preference and Fraudulent Transfer Safe Harbor
Last month, we discussed the fact that the The Bankruptcy Code (“Code”) has at least nine so-called “safe harbor” (i.e., bankruptcy insulating) provisions for financial contracts. As we showed in Part One, some lower courts have inconsistently enforced those safe harbor provisions in the preference and fraudulent transfer context, generating costly litigation for the asserted cause of creditor recovery. We continued by discussing the legislative history of the safe harbor.
In discussing the history of Enron, we pointed out that District Judge Colleen McMahon succinctly summarized the relevant legislative history, noting that it had first been “enacted in 1978 in response to a” decision holding that a bankruptcy trustee was not barred “from recovering [on fraudulent transfer grounds] a margin payment made to a commodities clearinghouse.” Seligson v. New York Produce Exchange, 394 F. Supp. 125, 128-36 (S.D.N.Y. 1975). Enron III, at *5. By 1982, explained the court, ” 546(e) “broadened the safe harbor by extending its scope to include the securities markets 'c 'ebeyond the ordinary course of business to include margin and settlement payments to and from brokers, clearing organizations, and financial institutions'f.” Enron III, at *5-6, quoting Kaiser Steel Corp. v. Charles Schwab & Co., (10th Cir. 1990) (“Kaiser I“), at 849, and citing H.R. Rep. 97-420, at *2 (1982). “This broad protection was designed to ensure settlement finality, and therefore market stability.” Enron III, at *6. The discussion concludes herein.
This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
- Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
- Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
- Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
Bankruptcy Sales: Finding a Diamond In the Rough
There is no efficient market for the sale of bankruptcy assets. Inefficient markets yield a transactional drag, potentially dampening the ability of debtors and trustees to maximize value for creditors. This article identifies ways in which investors may more easily discover bankruptcy asset sales.
Law Firms are Reducing Redundant Real Estate by Bringing Support Services Back to the Office
A trend analysis of the benefits and challenges of bringing back administrative, word processing and billing services to law offices.
Bit Parts
Summary Judgment Denied Defendant in Declaratory Action by Producer of To Kill a Mockingbird Broadway Play Seeking Amateur Theatrical Rights
Risks of “Baseball Arbitration” in Resolving Real Estate Disputes
“Baseball arbitration” refers to the process used in Major League Baseball in which if an eligible player's representative and the club ownership cannot reach a compensation agreement through negotiation, each party enters a final submission and during a formal hearing each side — player and management — presents its case and then the designated panel of arbitrators chooses one of the salary bids with no other result being allowed. This method has become increasingly popular even beyond the sport of baseball.
One Overlooked Element of Executive Safety: Data Privacy
Executives have access to some of the company's most sensitive information, and they're increasingly being targeted by hackers looking to steal company secrets or to perpetrate cybercrimes.