Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Assume that your client has been sued by a former employee, and that a post-termination electronic search of the employee's laptop uncovers e-mails to legal counsel. Can the client keep these e-mails for use in its defense? Or, are these attorney-client privileged communications that must be returned to the former employee? Does use of the employer's computer system constitute a waiver of the attorney-client privilege, making all communications discoverable? Does it matter whether the e-mails are sent from a company e-mail account, as opposed to a personal e-mail account accessed via the company's computer system?
The answer to these questions is a resounding “it depends.” In recent years, courts around the country have found themselves grappling with these and other tricky issues at the intersection of technology and the law. The result is a developing body of case law that considers new questions concerning the scope of workplace privacy and the attorney-client privilege.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.
The parameters set forth in the DOJ's memorandum have implications not only for the government's evaluation of compliance programs in the context of criminal charging decisions, but also for how defense counsel structure their conference-room advocacy seeking declinations or lesser sanctions in both criminal and civil investigations.
This article discusses the practical and policy reasons for the use of DPAs and NPAs in white-collar criminal investigations, and considers the NDAA's new reporting provision and its relationship with other efforts to enhance transparency in DOJ decision-making.
There is no efficient market for the sale of bankruptcy assets. Inefficient markets yield a transactional drag, potentially dampening the ability of debtors and trustees to maximize value for creditors. This article identifies ways in which investors may more easily discover bankruptcy asset sales.
This article explores legal developments over the past year that may impact compliance officer personal liability.