Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

The Corporate CounselorKickerFeaturesTopicsCommercial LawSectionsNewsLJN Newsletters

New Arbitration Rules

By Kevin F. Brady
April 28, 2010

The financial crisis has driven companies and their in-house counsel to focus on reducing costs and risks, especially when it comes to the ever-increasing legal costs and risks associated with litigation. While traditional alternative dispute resolution programs have been available for some time, they have drawbacks, such as: 1) timing (faster than traditional litigation but complex cases can take a long time to resolve); 2) substantial fees for experienced private arbitrators; and 3) the inability to appeal an arbitration award. Now there is a faster, less expensive, appealable option for in-house counsel to consider.

Following in the footsteps of its very successful mediation program, the Delaware Court of Chancery recently added a new weapon to its arsenal of alternative dispute resolution options to resolve business disputes with streamlined procedures that should reduce both the costs and the risks associated with the normal litigation process. Effective Feb. 1, 2010, that court implemented new fast-track arbitration procedures under 10 Del. C. ' 349, which provide for voluntary, confidential and binding resolution of business disputes before one of the members of the Court of Chancery usually within 90 days of requesting arbitration. With these new rules, the Court of Chancery now offers in-house counsel an opportunity to have a judge or master resolve a significant business dispute that would not otherwise qualify to be resolved by the Court of Chancery given its traditional equitable jurisdiction.

This premium content is locked for LJN Newsletters subscribers only

  • Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
  • Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
  • Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts

For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473

Read These Next
The DOJ's Corporate Enforcement Policy: One Year Later Image

The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.

Use of Deferred Prosecution Agreements In White Collar Investigations Image

This article discusses the practical and policy reasons for the use of DPAs and NPAs in white-collar criminal investigations, and considers the NDAA's new reporting provision and its relationship with other efforts to enhance transparency in DOJ decision-making.

The DOJ's New Parameters for Evaluating Corporate Compliance Programs Image

The parameters set forth in the DOJ's memorandum have implications not only for the government's evaluation of compliance programs in the context of criminal charging decisions, but also for how defense counsel structure their conference-room advocacy seeking declinations or lesser sanctions in both criminal and civil investigations.

CLE Shouldn't Be the Only Mandatory Training for Attorneys Image

Each stage of an attorney's career offers opportunities for a curriculum that addresses both the individual's and the firm's need to drive success.

A defendant in a patent infringement suit may, during discovery and prior to a <i>Markman</i> hearing, compel the plaintiff to produce claim charts, claim constructions, and element-by-element infringement analyses.