Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Comcast Corp.'s courthouse victory over the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) in April might not turn out to be a win for the company after all if it speeds the path for wider regulation of broadband services. A panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit ruled that the FCC failed to justify its jurisdiction to regulate Internet traffic. Comcast Corp. v. Federal Communications Commission, 08-1291. The unanimous ruling was a short-term affirmation for those who want to rein in the FCC's ability to impose “net neutrality” rules, but major battles loom in at least two venues: the commission and Congress. A loss in either place would mean a lot more uncertainty for companies like Comcast.
In a move that some say would spark the “World War III” of communications law, advocates for consumers and content providers want the FCC to reclassify Internet service providers as telephone-style common carriers. The idea has simmered for years, and the D.C. Circuit's ruling gives proponents a new reason to push. It could mean increased regulation and years of litigation, and it would likely split the FCC along partisan lines, with the three Democrats in favor and two Republicans opposed.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
There is no efficient market for the sale of bankruptcy assets. Inefficient markets yield a transactional drag, potentially dampening the ability of debtors and trustees to maximize value for creditors. This article identifies ways in which investors may more easily discover bankruptcy asset sales.
There's current litigation in the ongoing Beach Boys litigation saga. A lawsuit filed in 2019 against Nevada residents Mike Love and his wife Jacquelyne in the U.S. District Court for the District of Nevada that alleges inaccurate payment by the Loves under the retainer agreement and seeks $84.5 million in damages.
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
Blockchain domain names offer decentralized alternatives to traditional DNS-based domain names, promising enhanced security, privacy and censorship resistance. However, these benefits come with significant challenges, particularly for brand owners seeking to protect their trademarks in these new digital spaces.