Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

The Corporate CounselorKickerFeaturesTopicsLitigationSectionsNewsLJN Newsletters

DE Courts Tackle Novel Issues Presented by Contested Director Election

By Robert S. Reder
May 25, 2010

Recently, in Kurz v. Holbrook (C.A. No. 5019-VCL (Del. Ch. Feb. 9, 2010), aff'd in part and rev'd in part, No. 64 (Del. 2010)), the Delaware Court of Chancery and Supreme Court confronted dueling consent solicitations over control of the board of directors of EMAK Worldwide, Inc. This contest generated three issues of first impression:

  • Whether directors can be removed from office, mid-term, through a reduction in the size of the board effected via a stockholder-approved bylaw amendment;
  • Whether a purchase of the “swing votes” necessary to win the contest can constitute illegal vote buying; and
  • Whether an omnibus proxy is required from the Depositary Trust Company (“DTC”) in order for banks and brokers to vote “street name” shares on behalf of their customers.

Vice Chancellor Laster tackled these issues head-on in a thoughtful analysis that is likely to impact strategies and outcomes of future battles for corporate control. However, precisely because of the decision's potential precedential impact, the Delaware Supreme Court heard an appeal on an expedited basis. In a unanimous decision, the Supreme Court affirmed the Court of Chancery's decision in part and reversed it in part, thereby blunting the impact of the lower court decision in one area.

Background

This premium content is locked for LJN Newsletters subscribers only

  • Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
  • Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
  • Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts

For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473

Read These Next
The DOJ's Corporate Enforcement Policy: One Year Later Image

The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.

The DOJ's New Parameters for Evaluating Corporate Compliance Programs Image

The parameters set forth in the DOJ's memorandum have implications not only for the government's evaluation of compliance programs in the context of criminal charging decisions, but also for how defense counsel structure their conference-room advocacy seeking declinations or lesser sanctions in both criminal and civil investigations.

Use of Deferred Prosecution Agreements In White Collar Investigations Image

This article discusses the practical and policy reasons for the use of DPAs and NPAs in white-collar criminal investigations, and considers the NDAA's new reporting provision and its relationship with other efforts to enhance transparency in DOJ decision-making.

Bankruptcy Sales: Finding a Diamond In the Rough Image

There is no efficient market for the sale of bankruptcy assets. Inefficient markets yield a transactional drag, potentially dampening the ability of debtors and trustees to maximize value for creditors. This article identifies ways in which investors may more easily discover bankruptcy asset sales.

Compliance Officers: Recent Regulatory Guidance and Enforcement Actions and Mitigating the Risk of Personal Liability Image

This article explores legal developments over the past year that may impact compliance officer personal liability.