Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
On-the-job Internet surfing has become a problem that employers can no longer ignore. A recent Office of Inspector General investigation, for example, revealed that senior-level SEC staff, including an attorney, used their workplace computers to view online pornography for up to eight hours per day during the period of time that led this country's biggest economic meltdown since the Great Depression. See, www.washingtonpost. com/wp-srv/politics/documents/SEC PornSummary.pdf. The workplace Internet-abuse epidemic is not restricted to massive operations, either. Small companies express concerns that their staff wastes valuable office time tagging photos in Facebook and sending personal e-mails instead of doing work. Yet the blurry divide between prolonged, purely personal workplace Internet (ab)use and the occasional, legitimate need to use temporarily a company computer to communicate with a bank, an online vendor, or an attorney, continues. A company's decision on where to draw the line on personal use of workplace computers poses a great challenge to employers, and recent court rulings do not make the decision and its enforcement any easier.
Under what circumstances do employees who use a workplace computer to communicate with their attorneys waive the attorney-client privilege that would normally attach to such a communication? A recent ruling from New Jersey addressed this question. In Stengart v. Loving Care Agency, Inc., 2010 N.J. LEXIS 241 (N.J. March 30, 2010), the Supreme Court of New Jersey ruled that an employee's private, password-protected e-mails containing communications with her attorney remained privileged, despite the existence of a detailed, written workplace technology policy that expressly placed employees on notice that the employer could intercept and review communications made using the employer's computers at any time. The issue of how the attorney-client privilege applies to workplace e-mails remains murky in many jurisdictions, and this New Jersey ruling, and a few others, provide some much-needed guidance for employers and employees alike.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
There is no efficient market for the sale of bankruptcy assets. Inefficient markets yield a transactional drag, potentially dampening the ability of debtors and trustees to maximize value for creditors. This article identifies ways in which investors may more easily discover bankruptcy asset sales.
A trend analysis of the benefits and challenges of bringing back administrative, word processing and billing services to law offices.
Summary Judgment Denied Defendant in Declaratory Action by Producer of To Kill a Mockingbird Broadway Play Seeking Amateur Theatrical Rights
“Baseball arbitration” refers to the process used in Major League Baseball in which if an eligible player's representative and the club ownership cannot reach a compensation agreement through negotiation, each party enters a final submission and during a formal hearing each side — player and management — presents its case and then the designated panel of arbitrators chooses one of the salary bids with no other result being allowed. This method has become increasingly popular even beyond the sport of baseball.
Executives have access to some of the company's most sensitive information, and they're increasingly being targeted by hackers looking to steal company secrets or to perpetrate cybercrimes.