Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
In a landmark holding released May 3, the U.S. Supreme Court held in Hui v. Castaneda, — S.Ct. —-, 2010 WL 1740524 (U.S.), that the Public Health Service Act (PHSA), 42 U.S.C.A. ' 233(a), precludes Bivens-type actions against U.S. Public Health Service (PHS) personnel for constitutional violations arising out of the performance of their official duties. A Bivens action is one seeking damages against a federal agent for violation of a constitutional right. See Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents, 403 U.S. 388 (1971). Bivens held that such plaintiffs have a private right of action for damages against offending federal agents if: 1) no other federal remedy is available; and 2) Congress has not expressly restricted the right to recovery in the specific situation.
The Castaneda decision leaves the survivors of immigration detainee Francisco Castaneda without recourse against the medical providers who refused to offer him proper care. The claimants' sole available remedy has now been declared to be through a claim against the United States in accordance with the Federal Tort Claims Act (FTCA).
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
There is no efficient market for the sale of bankruptcy assets. Inefficient markets yield a transactional drag, potentially dampening the ability of debtors and trustees to maximize value for creditors. This article identifies ways in which investors may more easily discover bankruptcy asset sales.
A trend analysis of the benefits and challenges of bringing back administrative, word processing and billing services to law offices.
Summary Judgment Denied Defendant in Declaratory Action by Producer of To Kill a Mockingbird Broadway Play Seeking Amateur Theatrical Rights
“Baseball arbitration” refers to the process used in Major League Baseball in which if an eligible player's representative and the club ownership cannot reach a compensation agreement through negotiation, each party enters a final submission and during a formal hearing each side — player and management — presents its case and then the designated panel of arbitrators chooses one of the salary bids with no other result being allowed. This method has become increasingly popular even beyond the sport of baseball.
'Disconnect Between In-House and Outside Counsel is a continuation of the discussion of client expectations and the disconnect that often occurs. And although the outside attorneys should be pursuing how inside-counsel actually think, inside counsel should make an effort to impart this information without waiting to be asked.