Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%
Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Immigration Medical Care
In a landmark holding released May 3, the U.S. Supreme Court held in Hui v. Castaneda, — S.Ct. —-, 2010 WL 1740524 (U.S.), that the Public Health Service Act (PHSA), 42 U.S.C.A. ' 233(a), precludes Bivens-type actions against U.S. Public Health Service (PHS) personnel for constitutional violations arising out of the performance of their official duties. A Bivens action is one seeking damages against a federal agent for violation of a constitutional right. See Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents, 403 U.S. 388 (1971). Bivens held that such plaintiffs have a private right of action for damages against offending federal agents if: 1) no other federal remedy is available; and 2) Congress has not expressly restricted the right to recovery in the specific situation.
The Castaneda decision leaves the survivors of immigration detainee Francisco Castaneda without recourse against the medical providers who refused to offer him proper care. The claimants' sole available remedy has now been declared to be through a claim against the United States in accordance with the Federal Tort Claims Act (FTCA).
This premium content is locked for LJN Newsletters subscribers only
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
- Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
- Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
- Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
The DOJ's Corporate Enforcement Policy: One Year Later
The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.
Use of Deferred Prosecution Agreements In White Collar Investigations
This article discusses the practical and policy reasons for the use of DPAs and NPAs in white-collar criminal investigations, and considers the NDAA's new reporting provision and its relationship with other efforts to enhance transparency in DOJ decision-making.
The DOJ's New Parameters for Evaluating Corporate Compliance Programs
The parameters set forth in the DOJ's memorandum have implications not only for the government's evaluation of compliance programs in the context of criminal charging decisions, but also for how defense counsel structure their conference-room advocacy seeking declinations or lesser sanctions in both criminal and civil investigations.
CLE Shouldn't Be the Only Mandatory Training for Attorneys
Each stage of an attorney's career offers opportunities for a curriculum that addresses both the individual's and the firm's need to drive success.
Discovery of Claim Construction and Infringement Analysis May be Compelled Prior to a Markman Hearing
A defendant in a patent infringement suit may, during discovery and prior to a <i>Markman</i> hearing, compel the plaintiff to produce claim charts, claim constructions, and element-by-element infringement analyses.