Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
This year's annual ritual of dividing income is over now for most law firms. This round of decisions affects 2009 income and 2010 base or positioning in a prospective program. A year ago, the profession was quite anxious about the economy (legal and otherwise) and their personal financial futures. It was analogous to being boxed in with pressure being asserted on all six sides simultaneously ' a severely depressed economy, ultra tight credit markets, skittish partners reluctant or unable to contribute capital, price-sensitive clients under their own cost reduction imperatives, intractable landlords and facility leases, and competitive approaches by firms less severely affected by the downturn. The profession responded with serial layoffs, furloughs, reduced hours, wage freezes and reductions. Non-wage expenditures were scrutinized like never before. The medicine, while bitter, largely worked, although aided by an economy that finally found its bottom. Yet the recovery is not complete as the effective unemployment rate remains frustratingly high.
However, again like the economy, not all is right in the legal profession. Law firms struggle with competing interests of survival versus preservation of long-held values. One long-held value beginning to fall is the lock-step compensation arrangement for associates. Rightly or wrongly, it is giving way to “merit” based approaches where pay is tied to skills, competencies, and contributions. Another mainstay at risk is the role of recent law school graduates in law firms. Client push back on paying for first and second year associates has brought about renewed interest in apprenticeships. This is a worthy, albeit expensive, proposition for firms and associates alike. Firms continue their evaluation of partners ' equity and non-equity alike ' striving to maintain the key players for what they expect (some might say hope) to be the dominant post-recession practices.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
Possession of real property is a matter of physical fact. Having the right or legal entitlement to possession is not "possession," possession is "the fact of having or holding property in one's power." That power means having physical dominion and control over the property.
As consumers continue to shift purchasing and consumption habits in the aftermath of the pandemic, manufacturers are increasingly reliant on third-party logistics and warehousing to ensure their products timely reach the market.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.