Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
It is hard to spot amid all the publicity about new models for managing associates, but a second change in how firms manage their talent is also underway. After years of focusing on associates, law firms are beginning to realize that they need to pay more attention to their partners. The change has been slow, and most firms still take a “sink or swim” approach to their partners' careers. But more firms are concluding that the old approach has become too risky, because the waters in which their partners swim are too rough and their individual success is too critical to the firm's overall success. Over the next decade or two, the firms that act on this insight are likely to gain a significant competitive advantage.
If a firm wants to pursue this advantage, what should it do? To answer that question, this article draws on a recent survey of more than 500 partners in 44 major firms in the U.S. and Canada whom their firms identified as successful. (The survey was conducted by Tim Leishman and Steve Armstrong of Firm Leader and David Cruickshank of Kerma Partners.) It explored the participants' development after they became partners, the skills they regarded as most important to their present and future success, and the obstacles they saw in their paths.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.
This article discusses the practical and policy reasons for the use of DPAs and NPAs in white-collar criminal investigations, and considers the NDAA's new reporting provision and its relationship with other efforts to enhance transparency in DOJ decision-making.
The parameters set forth in the DOJ's memorandum have implications not only for the government's evaluation of compliance programs in the context of criminal charging decisions, but also for how defense counsel structure their conference-room advocacy seeking declinations or lesser sanctions in both criminal and civil investigations.
Each stage of an attorney's career offers opportunities for a curriculum that addresses both the individual's and the firm's need to drive success.
A defendant in a patent infringement suit may, during discovery and prior to a <i>Markman</i> hearing, compel the plaintiff to produce claim charts, claim constructions, and element-by-element infringement analyses.