Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

Practice Tip: The Rules of the Court of Public Opinion

By Jennifer Smith Finnegan and Leah Loeb
May 26, 2010

In which court is your latest product liability case pending? The answer may be not only a court of law, but also the court of public opinion. Media trials are certainly nothing new (think the Lindbergh Baby kidnapping trial in 1935). Yet the abundance of media outlets and the 24/7 news cycle they have created, both driving and feeding America's insatiable appetite for up-to-the minute news and gossip ' network and cable television, newspapers, blogs, social networking and social media sites, texting, radio, and magazines ' make it necessary to be prepared to try high-profile cases in the media as well as in court.

Product liability lawsuits tend to fall into this category of cases: They often involve sympathetic plaintiffs, with significant injuries, who allege that widely used products are unsafe or that the companies that make them have ignored the safety and welfare of consumers. Many plaintiffs' lawyers work closely with journalists and also create Web sites dedicated to their claims. Stories about product liability disputes quickly reach vast audiences, including consumers of your clients' products, your clients' investors, lenders, vendors, employees, and competitors ' not to mention judges and prospective jurors. Responding “no comment” to media inquiries can leave those audiences with an incorrect or damaging view of the case, your client and its products.

This premium content is locked for LJN Newsletters subscribers only

  • Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
  • Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
  • Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts

For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473

Read These Next
The DOJ's Corporate Enforcement Policy: One Year Later Image

The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.

The DOJ's New Parameters for Evaluating Corporate Compliance Programs Image

The parameters set forth in the DOJ's memorandum have implications not only for the government's evaluation of compliance programs in the context of criminal charging decisions, but also for how defense counsel structure their conference-room advocacy seeking declinations or lesser sanctions in both criminal and civil investigations.

Use of Deferred Prosecution Agreements In White Collar Investigations Image

This article discusses the practical and policy reasons for the use of DPAs and NPAs in white-collar criminal investigations, and considers the NDAA's new reporting provision and its relationship with other efforts to enhance transparency in DOJ decision-making.

Bankruptcy Sales: Finding a Diamond In the Rough Image

There is no efficient market for the sale of bankruptcy assets. Inefficient markets yield a transactional drag, potentially dampening the ability of debtors and trustees to maximize value for creditors. This article identifies ways in which investors may more easily discover bankruptcy asset sales.

Compliance Officers: Recent Regulatory Guidance and Enforcement Actions and Mitigating the Risk of Personal Liability Image

This article explores legal developments over the past year that may impact compliance officer personal liability.