Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
The federal government prohibits “any person“ from intercepting oral, wire or electronic communications. Federal Wiretapping Act, 18 U.S.C. ' 2511(1). Though “any person“ sounds universal enough, the definition of “any person“ is complicated by exceptions ' the explicit statutory exceptions and the implicit exceptions created by federal circuit courts. As yet, the Supreme Court has not clarified the Act's “any person“ definition. Thus, family lawyers remain uncertain as to how far the prohibitions of the Federal Wiretapping Act extend into the family home.
Recent cases bring more uncertainty to the issue. A reading of two recent district court decisions and a state court decision could lead a lawyer to conclude that the scope of liability under the federal law has no limitation at all within the domestic realm. In other words, “any person“ may be any spouse or any parent or any other family member who intentionally intercepts oral, wire or electronic communications without the consent of at least one party to the communication.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
There is no efficient market for the sale of bankruptcy assets. Inefficient markets yield a transactional drag, potentially dampening the ability of debtors and trustees to maximize value for creditors. This article identifies ways in which investors may more easily discover bankruptcy asset sales.
A trend analysis of the benefits and challenges of bringing back administrative, word processing and billing services to law offices.
Summary Judgment Denied Defendant in Declaratory Action by Producer of To Kill a Mockingbird Broadway Play Seeking Amateur Theatrical Rights
“Baseball arbitration” refers to the process used in Major League Baseball in which if an eligible player's representative and the club ownership cannot reach a compensation agreement through negotiation, each party enters a final submission and during a formal hearing each side — player and management — presents its case and then the designated panel of arbitrators chooses one of the salary bids with no other result being allowed. This method has become increasingly popular even beyond the sport of baseball.
'Disconnect Between In-House and Outside Counsel is a continuation of the discussion of client expectations and the disconnect that often occurs. And although the outside attorneys should be pursuing how inside-counsel actually think, inside counsel should make an effort to impart this information without waiting to be asked.