Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

Collateral Consequences of Criminal Conviction

By Eric M. Fish
May 27, 2010

Criminal convictions may result in numerous penalties beyond the imprisonment or fine imposed after trial. Commonly referred to as the “collateral consequences” of a conviction, these often hidden and misunderstood penalties exist in two forms: collateral sanctions and collateral disqualifications. Collateral sanctions are automatic changes in one's rights in connection with a conviction. Collateral disqualifications are penalties and disabilities that are imposed through the exercise of discretion by some governmental authority. The discretionary nature of some of the consequences and the variety of entities that may impose them create difficulties for lawyers attempting to inform their clients and often leave defendants either uninformed or ill-advised about all possible penalties as they enter into plea negotiations or sentencing.

A 2010 Supreme Court decision, Padilla v. Kentucky, expands a lawyer's duty to counsel a client about certain collateral consequences at the time of a plea. The case highlights the pervasiveness of collateral consequences and the importance of advising a client of all penalties that may result from a guilty verdict or plea. Meanwhile, a newly proposed Uniform State Law offers a potential solution to the bewildering problem of collateral consequences faced by criminal defendants and their lawyers.

This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only

  • Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
  • Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
  • Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts

For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473

Read These Next
Bankruptcy Sales: Finding a Diamond In the Rough Image

There is no efficient market for the sale of bankruptcy assets. Inefficient markets yield a transactional drag, potentially dampening the ability of debtors and trustees to maximize value for creditors. This article identifies ways in which investors may more easily discover bankruptcy asset sales.

Law Firms are Reducing Redundant Real Estate by Bringing Support Services Back to the Office Image

A trend analysis of the benefits and challenges of bringing back administrative, word processing and billing services to law offices.

Bit Parts Image

Summary Judgment Denied Defendant in Declaratory Action by Producer of To Kill a Mockingbird Broadway Play Seeking Amateur Theatrical Rights

Risks of “Baseball Arbitration” in Resolving Real Estate Disputes Image

“Baseball arbitration” refers to the process used in Major League Baseball in which if an eligible player's representative and the club ownership cannot reach a compensation agreement through negotiation, each party enters a final submission and during a formal hearing each side — player and management — presents its case and then the designated panel of arbitrators chooses one of the salary bids with no other result being allowed. This method has become increasingly popular even beyond the sport of baseball.

Disconnect Between In-House and Outside Counsel Image

'Disconnect Between In-House and Outside Counsel is a continuation of the discussion of client expectations and the disconnect that often occurs. And although the outside attorneys should be pursuing how inside-counsel actually think, inside counsel should make an effort to impart this information without waiting to be asked.