Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%
Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Off-Label Marketing and the First Amendment
Prosecutions for “off-label marketing” by manufacturers have become an important component of the government's health care initiative. “Off-label” usage of prescription drugs and medical devices refers to using a product for a purpose that is not specified in the labeling approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Manufacturers are prohibited from promoting off-label uses of their products, but health care providers may prescribe or use them as they choose, whether or not the use fits within the FDA-approved “label.” 21 U.S.C. ' 396.
Government fines and criminal prosecutions against manufacturers for promoting “off-label” uses have surged, especially for pharmaceuticals. In 2009 alone, the Department of Justice (DOJ) announced the largest health care fraud settlement in U.S. history ' a $2.3-billion settlement with Pfizer arising from the off-label promotion of certain pharmaceutical products. Eli Lilly, Bristol-Myers Squibb, and Novartis have also entered into multi-million-dollar settlements. AstraZeneca agreed in April 2010 to a $520 million settlement in connection with off-label marketing.
This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
- Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
- Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
- Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
The Article 8 Opt In
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
Major Differences In UK, U.S. Copyright Laws
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
Beach Boys Songs Written Decades Ago Triggered Current Quarrel With Lawyers
There's current litigation in the ongoing Beach Boys litigation saga. A lawsuit filed in 2019 against Nevada residents Mike Love and his wife Jacquelyne in the U.S. District Court for the District of Nevada that alleges inaccurate payment by the Loves under the retainer agreement and seeks $84.5 million in damages.
Strategy vs. Tactics: Two Sides of a Difficult Coin
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
Transfer Tax Implications on Real Property Leases
The real property transfer tax does not apply to all leases, and understanding the tax rules of the applicable jurisdiction can allow parties to plan ahead to avoid unnecessary tax liability.