Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
The Bankruptcy Abuse Prevention and Consumer Protection Act (“BAPCPA”) has had a profound effect on retail reorganizations, particularly, the restriction on bankruptcy courts' broad discretion to extend debtors' time to assume or reject leases. This shortened time period, a maximum of 210 days, has been alleged to be responsible for the death of retail reorganizations. Did BAPCPA further impact the debtor/landlord relationship ' by limiting the right to assign shopping center leases burdened by a clause requiring a use that either no longer exists or is economically unfeasible, e.g., Saturn dealerships, video rentals, beeper sales or typewriter repairs (“useless use clause”)? Under BAPCPA, courts' discretion to invalidate useless use clauses may be severely constrained. This dynamic combination of the time limitations and the strict enforcement of use clauses may effectively terminate many retail debtors' ability to assume or assign leases.
Prior to BAPCPA, courts considered these clauses de facto anti-assignment clauses and, as such, not enforceable. While 11 U.S.C. ' 365(b)(3) required adequate protection for the assumption of a shopping center lease (including use clauses), many courts balanced the rights of the debtor and shopping center landlords, excising useless use clauses pursuant to ' 365(f)(1)(addressing anti-assignment clauses). BAPCPA amended ' 365(f)(1) subjecting courts' discretion to modify use clauses to ' 365(b)(3) and, as such, many concluded that BAPCPA required strict compliance with shopping center lease use clauses, even useless use clauses. However, an analysis of the pre BAPCPA statute demonstrates that courts have liberally interpreted limitation on their discretion regarding shopping center leases. Thus, under BAPCPA, courts may continue to invalidate useless use clauses.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
There's current litigation in the ongoing Beach Boys litigation saga. A lawsuit filed in 2019 against Nevada residents Mike Love and his wife Jacquelyne in the U.S. District Court for the District of Nevada that alleges inaccurate payment by the Loves under the retainer agreement and seeks $84.5 million in damages.
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
The real property transfer tax does not apply to all leases, and understanding the tax rules of the applicable jurisdiction can allow parties to plan ahead to avoid unnecessary tax liability.