Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Ever since (and likely long before) Paul Revere's famous “Midnight Ride” of 1775, breaking news has been a hot commodity. And given the ease of distribution of information in the digital age, news organizations and content providers have found it increasingly difficult to prevent its wide release over the Internet, particularly uses that do not necessarily constitute copyright infringement. It seems, however, that the old “hot news” misappropriation doctrine ' first outlined by the Supreme Court in its almost century-old International News Service v. Associated Press, 248 U.S. 215 (1918) decision ' may offer a limited remedy against Web sites that “free-ride” on content providers' costly efforts to collect and generate time-sensitive news and materials.
Last year, the Southern District of New York reignited the 90-year-old hot news doctrine and applied it in the Internet context. In The Associated Press v. All Headline News Corp., 608 F. Supp. 2d 454 (S.D.N.Y. 2009), the district court found that a newswire's hot news misappropriation claim against a news aggregation Web site that collected news stories on the Internet and repackaged them under its own banner was valid under New York law. Since that decision, a number of entities have attempted to use the hot news doctrine to prevent the unauthorized use of time-sensitive content, including most recently, financial firms and media outlets attempting to prevent news-oriented Web sites from publishing their well-researched content.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
There's current litigation in the ongoing Beach Boys litigation saga. A lawsuit filed in 2019 against Nevada residents Mike Love and his wife Jacquelyne in the U.S. District Court for the District of Nevada that alleges inaccurate payment by the Loves under the retainer agreement and seeks $84.5 million in damages.
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
The real property transfer tax does not apply to all leases, and understanding the tax rules of the applicable jurisdiction can allow parties to plan ahead to avoid unnecessary tax liability.