Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Ever since (and likely long before) Paul Revere's famous “Midnight Ride” of 1775, breaking news has been a hot commodity. And given the ease of distribution of information in the digital age, news organizations and content providers have found it increasingly difficult to prevent its wide release over the Internet, particularly uses that do not necessarily constitute copyright infringement. It seems, however, that the old “hot news” misappropriation doctrine ' first outlined by the Supreme Court in its almost century-old International News Service v. Associated Press, 248 U.S. 215 (1918) decision ' may offer a limited remedy against Web sites that “free-ride” on content providers' costly efforts to collect and generate time-sensitive news and materials.
Last year, the Southern District of New York reignited the 90-year-old hot news doctrine and applied it in the Internet context. In The Associated Press v. All Headline News Corp., 608 F. Supp. 2d 454 (S.D.N.Y. 2009), the district court found that a newswire's hot news misappropriation claim against a news aggregation Web site that collected news stories on the Internet and repackaged them under its own banner was valid under New York law. Since that decision, a number of entities have attempted to use the hot news doctrine to prevent the unauthorized use of time-sensitive content, including most recently, financial firms and media outlets attempting to prevent news-oriented Web sites from publishing their well-researched content.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.
The parameters set forth in the DOJ's memorandum have implications not only for the government's evaluation of compliance programs in the context of criminal charging decisions, but also for how defense counsel structure their conference-room advocacy seeking declinations or lesser sanctions in both criminal and civil investigations.
This article discusses the practical and policy reasons for the use of DPAs and NPAs in white-collar criminal investigations, and considers the NDAA's new reporting provision and its relationship with other efforts to enhance transparency in DOJ decision-making.
There is no efficient market for the sale of bankruptcy assets. Inefficient markets yield a transactional drag, potentially dampening the ability of debtors and trustees to maximize value for creditors. This article identifies ways in which investors may more easily discover bankruptcy asset sales.
Active reading comprises many daily tasks lawyers engage in, including highlighting, annotating, note taking, comparing and searching texts. It demands more than flipping or turning pages.