Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Corporate America was not looking forward to the 2010 proxy season. First, in July 2009, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) approved the amendment of New York Stock Exchange Rule 452 to prevent brokers from exercising discretionary voting authority in the election of directors. Second, companies had to contend with significant new proxy statement disclosure requirements adopted in December 2009. Third, 2010 was heralded as the year when shareholder activism would reach new heights in the wake of the financial crisis and the ongoing recession. As a result, there were predictions that larger-than-ever numbers of directors would not be re-elected and company proposals would go down to defeat, while all sorts of shareholder initiatives would prevail.
It didn't quite work out that way. In fact, while the regulatory changes may have added to companies' workloads, they did not wreak havoc, and the new disclosures were generally well received. And as far as shareholder activism was concerned, 2010 represented more of a “whimper” than a “bang.” This article considers changes in the regulatory climate prior to the 2010 proxy season and the actual voting results, and looks at some issues that will affect proxy seasons in 2011 and beyond.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
There's current litigation in the ongoing Beach Boys litigation saga. A lawsuit filed in 2019 against Nevada residents Mike Love and his wife Jacquelyne in the U.S. District Court for the District of Nevada that alleges inaccurate payment by the Loves under the retainer agreement and seeks $84.5 million in damages.
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
The real property transfer tax does not apply to all leases, and understanding the tax rules of the applicable jurisdiction can allow parties to plan ahead to avoid unnecessary tax liability.