Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

SLAPPED for Speaking Out?

In recent years, disputes between parties with differing views on issues of public concern have spilled into the court system with increasing frequency. The term “SLAPP” (or “Strategic Lawsuit Against Public Participation”) was coined to refer to lawsuits brought against private individuals or organizations who, through speech, petition or other expressive conduct, seek to influence the actions or decisions of a public official or body.

SLAPPs come in many sizes and shapes. They can be brought by private individuals, government officials and corporations. They target individuals, community activists, corporations, associations and members of the media. They frequently include claims of defamation, invasion of privacy, interference with contract and other theories. They can be based on activities such as writing a letter to the editor of a newspaper, testifying before a state legislature or local city council, reporting official misconduct, circulating a petition, posting a blog or many other actions. But they all have one thing in common: At least in the eyes of the defendants, they are brought to distract the defendants from the issues at hand and to discourage them and others from speaking out. They do so by forcing the defendants to defend a court case against them, a potentially expensive proposition for those defendants who can afford counsel to represent them and a daunting task for those who cannot. And even if the lawsuit is ultimately found to be factually or legally baseless, under the American legal system, prevailing defendants can rarely recoup their fees and expenses from the party who sues them.

This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only

  • Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
  • Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
  • Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts

For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473

Read These Next
The Article 8 Opt In Image

The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.

Beach Boys Songs Written Decades Ago Triggered Current Quarrel With Lawyers Image

There's current litigation in the ongoing Beach Boys litigation saga. A lawsuit filed in 2019 against Nevada residents Mike Love and his wife Jacquelyne in the U.S. District Court for the District of Nevada that alleges inaccurate payment by the Loves under the retainer agreement and seeks $84.5 million in damages.

Major Differences In UK, U.S. Copyright Laws Image

This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.

Strategy vs. Tactics: Two Sides of a Difficult Coin Image

With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.

Transfer Tax Implications on Real Property Leases Image

The real property transfer tax does not apply to all leases, and understanding the tax rules of the applicable jurisdiction can allow parties to plan ahead to avoid unnecessary tax liability.