Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Connecticut Settles HIPAA Suit Against Insurer
In July, the office of Connecticut Attorney General Richard Blumenthal announced that the State had settled with medical insurer Health Net over a security breach that exposed 1.5 million patients' health records to possible misuse. Approximately 500,000 of the victims were Connecticut residents. The breach occurred when a computer disk containing private health and financial information was lost, possibly due to theft. To make matters worse, Health Net delayed informing the affected patients or law enforcement authorities for six months, a further violation of the federal Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 (HIPAA). The settlement includes a $250,000 payment to the State, as well as two years of credit monitoring and $1 million in identity theft insurance for the affected parties. In a statement accompanying the settlement announcement, Blumenthal said, “These missing medical records included some of the most personal, intimate patient information ' exposing individuals to grave embarrassment and emotional distress, as well as financial harm and identity theft. This settlement provides powerful systemic protections for consumers and payment to taxpayers.”
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
There's current litigation in the ongoing Beach Boys litigation saga. A lawsuit filed in 2019 against Nevada residents Mike Love and his wife Jacquelyne in the U.S. District Court for the District of Nevada that alleges inaccurate payment by the Loves under the retainer agreement and seeks $84.5 million in damages.
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
A common question that commercial landlords and tenants face is which of them is responsible for a repair to the subject premises. These disputes often center on whether the repair is "structural" or "nonstructural."