Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%
Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
The Deepwater Horizon Oil Spill: Potential Insurance Coverage Implications
On the morning of April 22, 2010, the Deepwater Horizon oil rig sank into the Gulf of Mexico. By that afternoon, oil from the undersea wellhead, owned by BP plc (“BP”) had appeared and begun to spread on the surface of the Gulf. By the time the flow of oil was stanched with a temporary cap on July 15, more than 200 million gallons of oil had leaked into the Gulf, creating an oil slick over 140 miles long and 70 miles wide, as well as multiple undersea plumes of dissolved oil invisible from the surface. A massive cleanup effort has been underway since shortly after the leak began; BP has spent more than $4 billion in a plan that involves over 30,000 workers. In addition to efforts to contain the oil at the wellhead and to skim oil from the surface, more than 11 million gallons of oil have been burned and hundreds of thousands of gallons of potentially toxic chemical dispersants have been sprayed to break up the oil.
More than 300 lawsuits have already been filed in Louisiana, Florida, Texas, Mississippi, and Alabama against BP and other corporations involved in the spill, including Transocean, Halliburton, and Cameron, with thousands more anticipated. Eventually, more than 100 classes of persons and businesses are expected to assert damages ' double the number after the 1989 Exxon Valdez oil spill, the claims from which are still being litigated today. Claimants will allege a wide variety of damages claims, including claims for environmental cleanup expenses, bodily injury, medical monitoring, and business interruption. Litigation is expected to focus on causation, damages, punitive damages, and allocation issues. While much of the ultimate liability for the spill is likely to fall directly on BP and other companies involved with Deepwater Horizon, the exposure to the insurance industry is estimated at between $1.5 and $3.5 billion. (Moody's; Business Insurance). Given that exposure, coverage disputes are likely to arise, even though the current implications may not yet be fully understood. This article briefly addresses the contours of the coverage lawsuit already filed against BP and other coverage disputes we may see in the future.
Beach Boys Songs Written Decades Ago Triggered Current Quarrel With Lawyers
There's current litigation in the ongoing Beach Boys litigation saga. A lawsuit filed in 2019 against Nevada residents Mike Love and his wife Jacquelyne in the U.S. District Court for the District of Nevada that alleges inaccurate payment by the Loves under the retainer agreement and seeks $84.5 million in damages.
The Article 8 Opt In
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
Major Differences In UK, U.S. Copyright Laws
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
Strategy vs. Tactics: Two Sides of a Difficult Coin
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
Transfer Tax Implications on Real Property Leases
The real property transfer tax does not apply to all leases, and understanding the tax rules of the applicable jurisdiction can allow parties to plan ahead to avoid unnecessary tax liability.