Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Mentoring is a win-win-win situation. First, the prot'g' (called “mentee” in this article) wins by establishing relationships with more experienced attorneys. Regular mentoring leads the mentee to professional excellence and higher morale, which fuel higher job satisfaction and quality of work. The mentor wins by feeling a sense of pride when the mentee develops into a thriving, satisfied professional. A quality mentor also receives a good reputation among the attorneys in the firm, which can lead to other firm leadership roles. Ultimately, the firm wins when it is easier to recruit, develop and retain associates. An all-inclusive mentoring program increases work quality and productivity as well as creating a sense of community and an effective learning environment.
The purpose of a mentoring program is to ensure that new attorneys are provided an opportunity to build a trusting and meaningful relationship with a senior associate and/or partner who will guide, monitor and enhance their professional growth. While it is important to provide associates with every opportunity for such support, associates should likewise be encouraged and trained to take a proactive role in their own development.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
There's current litigation in the ongoing Beach Boys litigation saga. A lawsuit filed in 2019 against Nevada residents Mike Love and his wife Jacquelyne in the U.S. District Court for the District of Nevada that alleges inaccurate payment by the Loves under the retainer agreement and seeks $84.5 million in damages.
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
The real property transfer tax does not apply to all leases, and understanding the tax rules of the applicable jurisdiction can allow parties to plan ahead to avoid unnecessary tax liability.