Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
The business world is an increasingly difficult environment to navigate, particularly for companies providing goods and services to consumers. With each new year, federal and state legislators and regulators establish additional well-intentioned but labyrinthine statutes and regulations regarding consumer protection, including in the areas of privacy, data security, and credit reporting. The requirements placed on corporate America as a result of these laws have created significant new potential liabilities, often in the form of statutorily mandated damages, that even conscientious companies can find themselves inadvertently facing. Simultaneously, those laws have created potential opportunities for plaintiffs' attorneys to exploit.
For example, a number of retail stores employing a nationally integrated credit card processing system found themselves facing significant potential liability when California, four years ahead of the federal government, enacted a law prohibiting the printing of electronic receipts with the full 16 digits of a customer's credit card. While their actions may have been inadvertent, these companies became subjects of class action lawsuits with significant potential liabilities.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
There's current litigation in the ongoing Beach Boys litigation saga. A lawsuit filed in 2019 against Nevada residents Mike Love and his wife Jacquelyne in the U.S. District Court for the District of Nevada that alleges inaccurate payment by the Loves under the retainer agreement and seeks $84.5 million in damages.
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
A common question that commercial landlords and tenants face is which of them is responsible for a repair to the subject premises. These disputes often center on whether the repair is "structural" or "nonstructural."