Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
There has been a significant surge in recent years in the number of patent re-examination requests filed against patents asserted in litigation. Indeed, re-examination is increasingly being utilized by accused patent infringers as a cost-effective tool to challenge patent validity, derail patent litigation proceedings, and limit the accused infringer's exposure to damages. In light of this trend, strategy considerations for the use of parallel patent re-examination proceedings as a tool in patent litigation are examined below.
Re-examination is a patent office procedure for amending or correcting an issued patent and usually involves reassessment of the patent's scope in view of new information concerning the state of the art at the time the patent application was filed. Patent re-examinations are initiated by a request, typically by a party that has been or may be accused of infringement, to the Patent and Trademark Office (“PTO”) to re-examine specifically identified claims of a patent in light of prior art references. If the request raises a “substantial new question of patentability,” the request is granted and the PTO initiates a re-examination proceeding during which the patent examiner determines if the patent claims should be canceled, amended or confirmed.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
A trend analysis of the benefits and challenges of bringing back administrative, word processing and billing services to law offices.
Summary Judgment Denied Defendant in Declaratory Action by Producer of To Kill a Mockingbird Broadway Play Seeking Amateur Theatrical Rights
“Baseball arbitration” refers to the process used in Major League Baseball in which if an eligible player's representative and the club ownership cannot reach a compensation agreement through negotiation, each party enters a final submission and during a formal hearing each side — player and management — presents its case and then the designated panel of arbitrators chooses one of the salary bids with no other result being allowed. This method has become increasingly popular even beyond the sport of baseball.
'Disconnect Between In-House and Outside Counsel is a continuation of the discussion of client expectations and the disconnect that often occurs. And although the outside attorneys should be pursuing how inside-counsel actually think, inside counsel should make an effort to impart this information without waiting to be asked.
There is no efficient market for the sale of bankruptcy assets. Inefficient markets yield a transactional drag, potentially dampening the ability of debtors and trustees to maximize value for creditors. This article identifies ways in which investors may more easily discover bankruptcy asset sales.