Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Law firms are heavy users of e-mail marketing, and with good reason. E-mail marketing offers law firms a professional way to proactively remind clients and other contacts about a firm's experience and expertise so those individuals will think of the firm first when an opportunity to refer new business arises. The campaign tracking tools available with e-mail marketing software also offer unique insights into the interests of individual clients based on their click-through activity.
How to Measure Good Results
The law firm e-mail newsletters, alerts and invitations that get the best results are those that follow “best practices” in terms of design, copy, and so forth. But what is a “good result” for a law firm e-mail marketing campaign? What is a good “open rate”? A good “click-through rate”? A bad “bounce rate”?
Until now, there were no benchmarks for the legal marketing community in identifying average open, click-through, bounce and unsubscribe rates for law firms. Legal marketers had no way to measure how their e-mail marketing campaigns were performing against their peers. To address that dearth of data, eLawMarketing recently released a report ' The State of Law Firm Email Marketing: Benchmarks, Trends and Best Practices ' documenting benchmarks for law firm e-mail marketing campaigns for five key performance metrics (e.g., open rate, click-through rate) based on campaigns totaling 6,896,610 e-mails distributed by law firms of all sizes from July 1, 2008 through June 30, 2010.
The report can help legal marketers:
The full report is available for download at: http://bit.ly/eLmReport. Briefly, it identifies the following trends for law firm e-mail marketing campaigns:
The full report also discusses issues to investigate when the results of a firm's e-mail marketing campaigns fall below industry benchmarks. For example, if a firm's open rates are substantially below legal industry norms, it may be because the firm is not following “best practices” for subject lines. Or, the firm's e-mails may not be sufficiently targeted. However, a sudden and dramatic decline in open rates may signal a deliverability issue at particular domains.
Click and Conversion Rates
Click and conversion rates for law firm e-mails are heavily driven by e-mail design “best practices.” For example:
If a firm's average click or conversion rates are substantially below legal industry norms, then it should consider an audit of its e-mail template designs to ensure compliance with “best practices.”
Social Media
The intersection of e-mail marketing and social media is also explored. Pundits have been predicting the demise of e-mail marketing for years. Culprits have included, at various times, spam, RSS feeds, blogs, texting, and now, social media. But to paraphrase Mark Twain, reports of e-mail's demise have always been greatly exaggerated. For example, the 2010 MarketingSherpa E-mail Marketing Benchmark Report found that an increasing number of marketers plan to leverage social media to grow their e-mail lists. And an October 2009 MarketingSherpa study found that e-mail was still the most popular method for sharing a link on the Internet with friends or family.
In short, e-mail and social media are not mutually exclusive options. So the better question to ask is: How can I integrate my social media efforts with my e-mail marketing program to achieve optimal results in both channels? The answer: Consider strategies like including social sharing buttons in e-mail campaigns. Or distribute periodic e-mails highlighting top blog posts as a method for building awareness of, and traffic to, firm blogs.
Conclusion
The State of Law Firm E-mail Marketing report now provides law firms with a valuable resource to compare the success of their e-mail marketing campaigns against their peers, and identify areas for improvement in terms of better adherence to “best practices.”
[IMGCAP(1)]
Joshua Fruchter, a member of this newsletter's Board of Editors, is president and co-founder of eLawMarketing, a provider of online marketing services to law firms and other professional service providers. He can be contacted at 866-833-6245 or at [email protected]. The firm's Web site is at www.elawmarketing.com and its blog is at http://www.lawyercasting.com/.
Law firms are heavy users of e-mail marketing, and with good reason. E-mail marketing offers law firms a professional way to proactively remind clients and other contacts about a firm's experience and expertise so those individuals will think of the firm first when an opportunity to refer new business arises. The campaign tracking tools available with e-mail marketing software also offer unique insights into the interests of individual clients based on their click-through activity.
How to Measure Good Results
The law firm e-mail newsletters, alerts and invitations that get the best results are those that follow “best practices” in terms of design, copy, and so forth. But what is a “good result” for a law firm e-mail marketing campaign? What is a good “open rate”? A good “click-through rate”? A bad “bounce rate”?
Until now, there were no benchmarks for the legal marketing community in identifying average open, click-through, bounce and unsubscribe rates for law firms. Legal marketers had no way to measure how their e-mail marketing campaigns were performing against their peers. To address that dearth of data, eLawMarketing recently released a report ' The State of Law Firm Email Marketing: Benchmarks, Trends and Best Practices ' documenting benchmarks for law firm e-mail marketing campaigns for five key performance metrics (e.g., open rate, click-through rate) based on campaigns totaling 6,896,610 e-mails distributed by law firms of all sizes from July 1, 2008 through June 30, 2010.
The report can help legal marketers:
The full report is available for download at: http://bit.ly/eLmReport. Briefly, it identifies the following trends for law firm e-mail marketing campaigns:
The full report also discusses issues to investigate when the results of a firm's e-mail marketing campaigns fall below industry benchmarks. For example, if a firm's open rates are substantially below legal industry norms, it may be because the firm is not following “best practices” for subject lines. Or, the firm's e-mails may not be sufficiently targeted. However, a sudden and dramatic decline in open rates may signal a deliverability issue at particular domains.
Click and Conversion Rates
Click and conversion rates for law firm e-mails are heavily driven by e-mail design “best practices.” For example:
If a firm's average click or conversion rates are substantially below legal industry norms, then it should consider an audit of its e-mail template designs to ensure compliance with “best practices.”
Social Media
The intersection of e-mail marketing and social media is also explored. Pundits have been predicting the demise of e-mail marketing for years. Culprits have included, at various times, spam, RSS feeds, blogs, texting, and now, social media. But to paraphrase Mark Twain, reports of e-mail's demise have always been greatly exaggerated. For example, the 2010 MarketingSherpa E-mail Marketing Benchmark Report found that an increasing number of marketers plan to leverage social media to grow their e-mail lists. And an October 2009 MarketingSherpa study found that e-mail was still the most popular method for sharing a link on the Internet with friends or family.
In short, e-mail and social media are not mutually exclusive options. So the better question to ask is: How can I integrate my social media efforts with my e-mail marketing program to achieve optimal results in both channels? The answer: Consider strategies like including social sharing buttons in e-mail campaigns. Or distribute periodic e-mails highlighting top blog posts as a method for building awareness of, and traffic to, firm blogs.
Conclusion
The State of Law Firm E-mail Marketing report now provides law firms with a valuable resource to compare the success of their e-mail marketing campaigns against their peers, and identify areas for improvement in terms of better adherence to “best practices.”
[IMGCAP(1)]
Joshua Fruchter, a member of this newsletter's Board of Editors, is president and co-founder of eLawMarketing, a provider of online marketing services to law firms and other professional service providers. He can be contacted at 866-833-6245 or at [email protected]. The firm's Web site is at www.elawmarketing.com and its blog is at http://www.lawyercasting.com/.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
Possession of real property is a matter of physical fact. Having the right or legal entitlement to possession is not "possession," possession is "the fact of having or holding property in one's power." That power means having physical dominion and control over the property.
In 1987, a unanimous Court of Appeals reaffirmed the vitality of the "stranger to the deed" rule, which holds that if a grantor executes a deed to a grantee purporting to create an easement in a third party, the easement is invalid. Daniello v. Wagner, decided by the Second Department on November 29th, makes it clear that not all grantors (or their lawyers) have received the Court of Appeals' message, suggesting that the rule needs re-examination.