Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Most participants in the distressed debt market for secured loans are familiar with the concept of adequate protection in bankruptcy. Typically, as part of a cash collateral order or an order approving a priming DIP loan, adequate protection is provided to secured lenders to protect against diminution in value of their security during a bankruptcy case. Although adequate protection often takes the form of replacement liens, superpriority claims, and payment of interest, fees, and expenses, the bankruptcy code allows it to take any form that results in the realization by secured lenders of the “indubitable equivalent” of their interest in collateral. 11 U.S.C. ' 361(3). Recently, in In re TOUSA Inc. (“TOUSA“) and In re Capmark Fin. Group Inc. (“Capmark“), secured lenders have received, as part of their adequate protection package, the right to obtain principal paydowns during a bankruptcy case.
Principal paydowns during a Chapter 11 case not only provide lenders with obvious benefit, but also could benefit debtors' estates by reducing interest expense in cases where secured creditors are oversecured. In such cases, pursuant to ' 506(b) of the bankruptcy code, the oversecured creditor would be entitled to receive post-petition interest at the applicable rate provided in the loan document through the effective date of the plan of reorganization, while debtors typically are required to hold their cash in bank accounts at approved financial institutions that have minimal risk and corresponding loan interest rates. 11 U.S.C. ' 345. The resulting negative interest spread, therefore, could be significant.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.
The parameters set forth in the DOJ's memorandum have implications not only for the government's evaluation of compliance programs in the context of criminal charging decisions, but also for how defense counsel structure their conference-room advocacy seeking declinations or lesser sanctions in both criminal and civil investigations.
This article discusses the practical and policy reasons for the use of DPAs and NPAs in white-collar criminal investigations, and considers the NDAA's new reporting provision and its relationship with other efforts to enhance transparency in DOJ decision-making.
There is no efficient market for the sale of bankruptcy assets. Inefficient markets yield a transactional drag, potentially dampening the ability of debtors and trustees to maximize value for creditors. This article identifies ways in which investors may more easily discover bankruptcy asset sales.
This article explores legal developments over the past year that may impact compliance officer personal liability.