Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
The U.S. Supreme Court rarely tackles commercial law issues, but has addressed an important franchise law issue this year. Recently, a franchise law case did raise a federal question involving the Petroleum Marketing Practices Act (Act). The Act is intended to protect service station dealers from unjust terminations and non-renewal, but did not address constructive termination or nonrenewal. On March 2, 2010, the Court unanimously held that a franchisee that stays in business cannot sue for constructive termination under the Act. The Court also decided that a franchisee waives its constructive nonrenewal claim when it actually enters into a renewal agreement.
These decisions by the Supreme Court are more than mere questions of whether the dealers can obtain a federal forum. Under the Act, not only are the dealers entitled to a federal forum, but in addition, they are granted a relaxed standard in order to obtain a preliminary injunction against termination or nonrenewal and enhanced recovery of damages in the form of counsel and expert fees.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
A trend analysis of the benefits and challenges of bringing back administrative, word processing and billing services to law offices.
There is no efficient market for the sale of bankruptcy assets. Inefficient markets yield a transactional drag, potentially dampening the ability of debtors and trustees to maximize value for creditors. This article identifies ways in which investors may more easily discover bankruptcy asset sales.
Summary Judgment Denied Defendant in Declaratory Action by Producer of To Kill a Mockingbird Broadway Play Seeking Amateur Theatrical Rights
“Baseball arbitration” refers to the process used in Major League Baseball in which if an eligible player's representative and the club ownership cannot reach a compensation agreement through negotiation, each party enters a final submission and during a formal hearing each side — player and management — presents its case and then the designated panel of arbitrators chooses one of the salary bids with no other result being allowed. This method has become increasingly popular even beyond the sport of baseball.
'Disconnect Between In-House and Outside Counsel is a continuation of the discussion of client expectations and the disconnect that often occurs. And although the outside attorneys should be pursuing how inside-counsel actually think, inside counsel should make an effort to impart this information without waiting to be asked.