Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Evidentiary Restrictions on Proving Copyright Substantial Similarity
The U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York has issued a reminder of its ' and the Second Circuit's ' restrictive view on the use of experts' reports and other exhibits for determining substantial similarity in copyright infringement cases. District Judge Laura Taylor Swain found no substantial similarity between the 2007 Steven Spielberg-produced movie Disturbia and the 1942 short story “It Had to Be Murder,” by Cornell Woolrich, on which the 1954 movie Rear Window was based. The Sheldon Abend Revocable Trust v. Spielberg, 08 Civ. 7810(LTS)(JCF). (The October 2010 issue of Entertainment Law & Finance contains a retrospective article on the U.S. Supreme Court's 1990 decision regarding continued use of the Woolrich-story's derivative elements in Rear Window. See, www.ljnonline.com/issues/ljn_entertainment/25_10/news/154279-1.html. The article discussed the Disturbia complaint but was completed just before the Southern District issued its recent ruling.) In her summary judgment ruling, Southern District Judge Swain observed that the plaintiff had “submitted thousands of pages of exhibits.” The district judge then cautioned in a footnote: “The opinions of experts or other third parties are irrelevant to a determination of substantial similarity [though they may be used to show actual copying by a copyright defendant]. ' Nor are lists or charts, in any medium, of purported similarities relevant to a determination of substantial similarity. ' Furthermore, because 'the Court considers the works as they were presented to the public' ' earlier drafts of a book, manuscript, or screenplay are irrelevant. Opinions of third parties published in secondary materials [e.g., movie reviews] are also irrelevant.” In the Second Circuit, substantial similarity is instead determined from the perspective of the “ordinary observer.”
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
There is no efficient market for the sale of bankruptcy assets. Inefficient markets yield a transactional drag, potentially dampening the ability of debtors and trustees to maximize value for creditors. This article identifies ways in which investors may more easily discover bankruptcy asset sales.
A federal district court in Miami, FL, has ruled that former National Basketball Association star Shaquille O'Neal will have to face a lawsuit over his promotion of unregistered securities in the form of cryptocurrency tokens and that he was a "seller" of these unregistered securities.
Why is it that those who are best skilled at advocating for others are ill-equipped at advocating for their own skills and what to do about it?
Blockchain domain names offer decentralized alternatives to traditional DNS-based domain names, promising enhanced security, privacy and censorship resistance. However, these benefits come with significant challenges, particularly for brand owners seeking to protect their trademarks in these new digital spaces.
In recent years, there has been a growing number of dry cleaners claiming to be "organic," "green," or "eco-friendly." While that may be true with respect to some, many dry cleaners continue to use a cleaning method involving the use of a solvent called perchloroethylene, commonly known as perc. And, there seems to be an increasing number of lawsuits stemming from environmental problems associated with historic dry cleaning operations utilizing this chemical.