Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Over the past 15 years, there has been a surge of litigation in U.S. courts brought by foreign plaintiffs alleging harm from actions purportedly taken by U.S. companies in foreign countries. These lawsuits are generally brought under the Alien Torts Statute, 28 U.S.C. ' 1350 (“ATS”), a statute enacted in 1789 to provide U.S. jurisdiction for “violations against the law of nations.” The ATS was first enacted in response to attacks on U.S. ships by the Barbary pirates, and it lay dormant until the 1970s, when human rights lawyers began using it to prosecute human rights claims against foreign dictators and repressive regimes. In the mid-1990s, however, plaintiffs' attorneys started using the ATS to target multinational corporations that allegedly injured residents in foreign countries, and the theories of liability began expanding to include, inter alia, environmental tort claims and product liability litigation. Since that time, over 120 ATS lawsuits have been brought by foreign plaintiffs against a wide array of U.S. corporations, including companies in the oil, mining, financial services, food and beverage, transportation, and communications industries. See U.S. Chamber of Commerce Institute for Legal Reform, Think Globally Sue Locally: Out-of-Court Tactics Employed by Plaintiffs, Their Lawyers, and Their Advocates in Transnational Tort Cases, at 17-18 (June 2010), available at http://www.instituteforlegalreform.com/images/stories/documents/pdf/international/thinkgloballysuelocally.pdf.
Traditionally, the standard approach for a U.S. company sued by foreign plaintiffs for actions taken outside the United States was a motion to dismiss on the grounds of forum non conveniens. However, with apologies to the British punk band The Clash, recent developments in ATS litigation suggest that the traditional answer to the question “Should I Stay or Should I Go Now?” may no longer be the best answer. While it is true that if a defendant stays in U.S. court “there may be trouble,” the trouble facing a defendant that goes the forum non conveniens route and submits to jurisdiction in a foreign country, “may be double.”
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
There is no efficient market for the sale of bankruptcy assets. Inefficient markets yield a transactional drag, potentially dampening the ability of debtors and trustees to maximize value for creditors. This article identifies ways in which investors may more easily discover bankruptcy asset sales.
A federal district court in Miami, FL, has ruled that former National Basketball Association star Shaquille O'Neal will have to face a lawsuit over his promotion of unregistered securities in the form of cryptocurrency tokens and that he was a "seller" of these unregistered securities.
Why is it that those who are best skilled at advocating for others are ill-equipped at advocating for their own skills and what to do about it?
Blockchain domain names offer decentralized alternatives to traditional DNS-based domain names, promising enhanced security, privacy and censorship resistance. However, these benefits come with significant challenges, particularly for brand owners seeking to protect their trademarks in these new digital spaces.
In recent years, there has been a growing number of dry cleaners claiming to be "organic," "green," or "eco-friendly." While that may be true with respect to some, many dry cleaners continue to use a cleaning method involving the use of a solvent called perchloroethylene, commonly known as perc. And, there seems to be an increasing number of lawsuits stemming from environmental problems associated with historic dry cleaning operations utilizing this chemical.