Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Perhaps this sounds familiar. A former employee, years ago, created the fodder for an ongoing series of lawsuits by gratuitously authoring a critical assessment of a product's potential problems in a company memorandum or e-mail. His literary excess was fueled by a creative writing course he was taking on the side, which suggested that embellishment was good for imaginative story-telling. The employee, who continues to stand by the company, is long gone, but his document has taken on a life of its own. Or, perhaps there is a former employee, involved with labor and wage issues in the past, who now sees an opportunity for “pay-back” by claiming that all kinds of interesting transgressions were committed on your production line. Product manufacturers are often faced with the dreaded notice: Plaintiff's counsel seeks to depose these former employees who authored the so-called “bad” document, or left with a grudge. Even worse, a manufacturer finds out, after the fact, that former employees have already been contacted and have given statements. What, if anything, can manufacturers do to protect themselves?
Ex-Parte Interviews
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
Why is it that those who are best skilled at advocating for others are ill-equipped at advocating for their own skills and what to do about it?
There is no efficient market for the sale of bankruptcy assets. Inefficient markets yield a transactional drag, potentially dampening the ability of debtors and trustees to maximize value for creditors. This article identifies ways in which investors may more easily discover bankruptcy asset sales.
The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.
Active reading comprises many daily tasks lawyers engage in, including highlighting, annotating, note taking, comparing and searching texts. It demands more than flipping or turning pages.
With trillions of dollars to keep watch over, the last thing we need is the distraction of costly litigation brought on by patent assertion entities (PAEs or "patent trolls"), companies that don't make any products but instead seek royalties by asserting their patents against those who do make products.