Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Perhaps this sounds familiar. A former employee, years ago, created the fodder for an ongoing series of lawsuits by gratuitously authoring a critical assessment of a product's potential problems in a company memorandum or e-mail. His literary excess was fueled by a creative writing course he was taking on the side, which suggested that embellishment was good for imaginative story-telling. The employee, who continues to stand by the company, is long gone, but his document has taken on a life of its own. Or, perhaps there is a former employee, involved with labor and wage issues in the past, who now sees an opportunity for “pay-back” by claiming that all kinds of interesting transgressions were committed on your production line. Product manufacturers are often faced with the dreaded notice: Plaintiff's counsel seeks to depose these former employees who authored the so-called “bad” document, or left with a grudge. Even worse, a manufacturer finds out, after the fact, that former employees have already been contacted and have given statements. What, if anything, can manufacturers do to protect themselves?
Ex-Parte Interviews
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
Possession of real property is a matter of physical fact. Having the right or legal entitlement to possession is not "possession," possession is "the fact of having or holding property in one's power." That power means having physical dominion and control over the property.
As consumers continue to shift purchasing and consumption habits in the aftermath of the pandemic, manufacturers are increasingly reliant on third-party logistics and warehousing to ensure their products timely reach the market.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.