Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
A recent decision by the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit, Official Comm of Unsecured Creditors v. Anderson Senior Living Prop, LLC (In re Nashville Senior Living, LLC), 620 F.3d 584 (6th Cir. 2010), tackled the scope of the protection offered by ' 363(m) of the Bankruptcy Code. Section 363(m) mandates that a court cannot unwind on appeal a sale of estate property to a good-faith purchaser authorized pursuant to ' 363(b) or (c) of the Bankruptcy Code. In Nashville, the Sixth Circuit held that ' 363(m) insulates from attack sales of property co-owned by non-debtors. The Sixth Circuit's opinion may rebuke implicitly a controversial holding of the Ninth Circuit Bankruptcy Appellate Panel in 2008, holding that the lien-stripping effect of a sale pursuant to ' 363(f) of the Bankruptcy Code could be unwound on appeal.
Background
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
There is no efficient market for the sale of bankruptcy assets. Inefficient markets yield a transactional drag, potentially dampening the ability of debtors and trustees to maximize value for creditors. This article identifies ways in which investors may more easily discover bankruptcy asset sales.
A trend analysis of the benefits and challenges of bringing back administrative, word processing and billing services to law offices.
Summary Judgment Denied Defendant in Declaratory Action by Producer of To Kill a Mockingbird Broadway Play Seeking Amateur Theatrical Rights
“Baseball arbitration” refers to the process used in Major League Baseball in which if an eligible player's representative and the club ownership cannot reach a compensation agreement through negotiation, each party enters a final submission and during a formal hearing each side — player and management — presents its case and then the designated panel of arbitrators chooses one of the salary bids with no other result being allowed. This method has become increasingly popular even beyond the sport of baseball.
Executives have access to some of the company's most sensitive information, and they're increasingly being targeted by hackers looking to steal company secrets or to perpetrate cybercrimes.