Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
If love and marriage go together like a horse and carriage, surely a demand for subordination should be followed by a request for nondisturbance. For purposes of this article, it is assumed that the request (demand) for subordination is being made by a landlord (currently in lease negotiations with a prospective tenant) who intends to effect a financing either in the near future for initial permanent funding, or in the distant future for perhaps expansion or eventual refinancing. In effect, subordination (and attornment) by a tenant is the tenant's vow to remain a tenant through good times or bad (including foreclosure and its aftermath), for better or for worse; but, if the landlord does not give the tenant nondisturbance protection, the landlord is not reciprocating the vow. Naked subordination (subordination without nondisturbance) allows any mortgagee who may succeed to the landlord's position by foreclosure to accept or reject the tenant (i.e., honor or terminate the tenant's lease) by virtue of the tenant's subordinate position.
A tenant will be subordinate to a lender who “takes over the property” by foreclosure either because the lender's mortgage was recorded prior to the execution of the tenant's lease (whether or not the lease is recorded), or because the tenant, whose lease was prior in time to the recordation of the lender's mortgage, executed a subordination agreement. Recent events have shown that the previously unlikely scenario of a landlord default followed by a lender takeover is not only possible but is no longer a rarity. As a result, many tenants are now vulnerable to successors in interest who may either terminate their leaseholds or continue them after weakening many leasehold rights. Accordingly, tenants must start to focus on subordination provisions in order to ameliorate the harsh potential results of naked subordination.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
There is no efficient market for the sale of bankruptcy assets. Inefficient markets yield a transactional drag, potentially dampening the ability of debtors and trustees to maximize value for creditors. This article identifies ways in which investors may more easily discover bankruptcy asset sales.
A trend analysis of the benefits and challenges of bringing back administrative, word processing and billing services to law offices.
Summary Judgment Denied Defendant in Declaratory Action by Producer of To Kill a Mockingbird Broadway Play Seeking Amateur Theatrical Rights
“Baseball arbitration” refers to the process used in Major League Baseball in which if an eligible player's representative and the club ownership cannot reach a compensation agreement through negotiation, each party enters a final submission and during a formal hearing each side — player and management — presents its case and then the designated panel of arbitrators chooses one of the salary bids with no other result being allowed. This method has become increasingly popular even beyond the sport of baseball.
Executives have access to some of the company's most sensitive information, and they're increasingly being targeted by hackers looking to steal company secrets or to perpetrate cybercrimes.