Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Band Members' Royalty Claims Against Survivor Principal Survive Dismissal
The U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, Eastern Division, decided that two musicians who joined the rock band Survivor after its founding could proceed with royalty counterclaims against band principal Frank Sullivan and Survivor Music. Sullivan v. Jamison, 06 C 5240. (Sullivan had sued Jamison for trademark infringement.) Neither counterclaimant, vocalist Jimmy Jamison nor bassist Stephan Ellis, were in Survivor when the band signed a 1978 recording agreement with Scotti Brothers Records. But District Judge Sharon Johnson Coleman noted that the 1978 contract and an amended 1983 recording agreement with Scotti Brothers “incorporated new members of the band through the execution of inducement letters and bound them to the contracts to the same degree as the original members.” Judge Coleman also noted, for example: “On [Oct.] 23, 1986, Gerald Margolis, an attorney for Survivor, wrote a letter to Jamison's attorney concerning the relationship between the corporation Survivor Music Enterprises, Inc. and Jamison. The letter states in relevant part, 'So far as I am able to ascertain from John Baruck [manager] and from the accountant for Survivor Music Enterprises, Inc., Jimi Jamison has indeed and in fact been extended and enjoyed all the benefits of the other individual members of the recording and performing group Survivor, commencing with the admission of him as a member of the group and through the present date ' the group is comprised of five individuals (including your client), and business structures aside, the net revenues of the group from personal appearances and phonorecords are split among the members in equal shares.'”
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
There's current litigation in the ongoing Beach Boys litigation saga. A lawsuit filed in 2019 against Nevada residents Mike Love and his wife Jacquelyne in the U.S. District Court for the District of Nevada that alleges inaccurate payment by the Loves under the retainer agreement and seeks $84.5 million in damages.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
The real property transfer tax does not apply to all leases, and understanding the tax rules of the applicable jurisdiction can allow parties to plan ahead to avoid unnecessary tax liability.