Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
RIGHT OF PUBLICITY/EXPERT WITNESSES
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the First Circuit decided that a right-of-publicity plaintiff's damages under Florida law should be based on the defendant's usage, rather than sales, data. Ji v. Bose Corp., 09-2341. Model Ting Ji sued in Florida federal court over use, on Bose home-entertainment-system packaging and promotion, of a photo in which she appeared. After Bose had the case transferred to the District of Massachusetts, where the company is based, the district court dismissed Ji's false endorsement claim under the Lanham Act. Following a trial, the jury found Bose violated Ji's right of publicity and privacy rights, but awarded her $10,000, rather then the $2 million she sought.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.
This article discusses the practical and policy reasons for the use of DPAs and NPAs in white-collar criminal investigations, and considers the NDAA's new reporting provision and its relationship with other efforts to enhance transparency in DOJ decision-making.
The parameters set forth in the DOJ's memorandum have implications not only for the government's evaluation of compliance programs in the context of criminal charging decisions, but also for how defense counsel structure their conference-room advocacy seeking declinations or lesser sanctions in both criminal and civil investigations.
Each stage of an attorney's career offers opportunities for a curriculum that addresses both the individual's and the firm's need to drive success.
A defendant in a patent infringement suit may, during discovery and prior to a <i>Markman</i> hearing, compel the plaintiff to produce claim charts, claim constructions, and element-by-element infringement analyses.