Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

Business Crimes Hotline

By ALM Staff | Law Journal Newsletters |
January 26, 2011

CALIFORNIA

Former Chairman of McKeeson Corporation Sentenced to 10 Years in Prison

U.S. District Court Judge William H. Alsup sentenced Charles McCall to 10 years in prison and ordered him to pay a $1 million fine for his alleged role in a fraud designed to inflate sales revenue.

McCall was indicted in 2003 and, after a 2006 jury trial, was acquitted on conspiracy charges, but the jury failed to resolve other charges. Thereafter, federal prosecutors re-indicted McCall, leading to his 2009 re-trial. McCall was convicted in November 2010 of five counts of securities fraud and circumventing accounting rules. The government alleged that McCall had backdated sales contracts to meet projections by recognizing revenue early.

The prison term was the minimum sentence, five years less than what the government requested. McCall's attorney said that he would appeal the conviction and that his client maintains his innocence.

Five other former McKeeson executives had pleaded guilty as a part of the government's investigation. In 2005, the company settled investor suits by agreeing to pay $960 million.

DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Online Sales of Counterfeit Goods Targeted in Nationwide 'Cyber Monday' Seizure of Web Site Domains

On Nov. 29, 2010, Attorney General Eric Holder and Director John Morton of the Department of Homeland Security's Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) announced that Operation in Our Sites v. 2.0, a joint operation targeting online retailers of counterfeit goods, had led to the execution of 82 seizure orders against commercial Web site domain names for their sale and/or distribution of copyrighted works and counterfeit goods. The National Intellectual Property Rights Coordination Center (IPR Center), led by ICE's Office of Homeland Security Investigations (HIS), headed up the investigation, with assistance from the Computer Crime and Intellectual Property, and Asset Forfeiture and Money Laundering sections of the DOJ's Criminal Division and U.S. Attorney's Offices in nine districts.

Operation in Our Sites v. 2.0 built upon Operation in Our Sites I, which was announced in June 2010. While the latter targeted nine Web site domain names engaged in sales of pirated first-run movie copies, the scope of the former expanded to include domain names selling counterfeit sporting goods and athletic clothing, handbags and sunglasses, in addition to copies of copyrighted software, music, and DVDs. As part of their efforts to secure the seizure orders needed to shut down the Web sites, federal law enforcement agents worked undercover to purchase suspected counterfeit items online. Once purchased, the goods, which were often shipped via international express mail into the U.S. from suppliers abroad, were determined to be counterfeit or illegal in some other manner. Magistrate judges issued the requested seizure orders for the respective Web site domain names. According to the government, those Web sites now contain a banner notifying those seeking to access each Web site that the domain name has been seized by federal authorities.


In the Courts and Business Crimes Hotline were written by Associate Editor Kenneth S. Clark and Matthew J. Alexander, respectively. Both are associates at Kirkland & Ellis LLP, Washington, DC.

CALIFORNIA

Former Chairman of McKeeson Corporation Sentenced to 10 Years in Prison

U.S. District Court Judge William H. Alsup sentenced Charles McCall to 10 years in prison and ordered him to pay a $1 million fine for his alleged role in a fraud designed to inflate sales revenue.

McCall was indicted in 2003 and, after a 2006 jury trial, was acquitted on conspiracy charges, but the jury failed to resolve other charges. Thereafter, federal prosecutors re-indicted McCall, leading to his 2009 re-trial. McCall was convicted in November 2010 of five counts of securities fraud and circumventing accounting rules. The government alleged that McCall had backdated sales contracts to meet projections by recognizing revenue early.

The prison term was the minimum sentence, five years less than what the government requested. McCall's attorney said that he would appeal the conviction and that his client maintains his innocence.

Five other former McKeeson executives had pleaded guilty as a part of the government's investigation. In 2005, the company settled investor suits by agreeing to pay $960 million.

DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Online Sales of Counterfeit Goods Targeted in Nationwide 'Cyber Monday' Seizure of Web Site Domains

On Nov. 29, 2010, Attorney General Eric Holder and Director John Morton of the Department of Homeland Security's Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) announced that Operation in Our Sites v. 2.0, a joint operation targeting online retailers of counterfeit goods, had led to the execution of 82 seizure orders against commercial Web site domain names for their sale and/or distribution of copyrighted works and counterfeit goods. The National Intellectual Property Rights Coordination Center (IPR Center), led by ICE's Office of Homeland Security Investigations (HIS), headed up the investigation, with assistance from the Computer Crime and Intellectual Property, and Asset Forfeiture and Money Laundering sections of the DOJ's Criminal Division and U.S. Attorney's Offices in nine districts.

Operation in Our Sites v. 2.0 built upon Operation in Our Sites I, which was announced in June 2010. While the latter targeted nine Web site domain names engaged in sales of pirated first-run movie copies, the scope of the former expanded to include domain names selling counterfeit sporting goods and athletic clothing, handbags and sunglasses, in addition to copies of copyrighted software, music, and DVDs. As part of their efforts to secure the seizure orders needed to shut down the Web sites, federal law enforcement agents worked undercover to purchase suspected counterfeit items online. Once purchased, the goods, which were often shipped via international express mail into the U.S. from suppliers abroad, were determined to be counterfeit or illegal in some other manner. Magistrate judges issued the requested seizure orders for the respective Web site domain names. According to the government, those Web sites now contain a banner notifying those seeking to access each Web site that the domain name has been seized by federal authorities.


In the Courts and Business Crimes Hotline were written by Associate Editor Kenneth S. Clark and Matthew J. Alexander, respectively. Both are associates at Kirkland & Ellis LLP, Washington, DC.

This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only

  • Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
  • Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
  • Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts

For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473

Read These Next
Major Differences In UK, U.S. Copyright Laws Image

This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.

The Article 8 Opt In Image

The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.

Strategy vs. Tactics: Two Sides of a Difficult Coin Image

With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.

Legal Possession: What Does It Mean? Image

Possession of real property is a matter of physical fact. Having the right or legal entitlement to possession is not "possession," possession is "the fact of having or holding property in one's power." That power means having physical dominion and control over the property.

The Stranger to the Deed Rule Image

In 1987, a unanimous Court of Appeals reaffirmed the vitality of the "stranger to the deed" rule, which holds that if a grantor executes a deed to a grantee purporting to create an easement in a third party, the easement is invalid. Daniello v. Wagner, decided by the Second Department on November 29th, makes it clear that not all grantors (or their lawyers) have received the Court of Appeals' message, suggesting that the rule needs re-examination.