Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ruled it has subject matter jurisdiction over a legal malpractice suit filed over the handling of a patent. Warrior Sports Inc. v. Dickinson Wright P.L.L.C., 2010-1091. The Michigan law firm Artz & Artz (which later merged with Dickinson Wright) had represented Warrior Sports, an owner of patents for lacrosse sports gear, in the patent application, reissue proceedings and litigation of U.S. Patent No. RE 38,216. When Warrior alleged that competitor STX L.L.C. infringed on the '216 patent, STX raised an inequitable conduct defense by claiming that attorney John S. Artz had misrepresented the makeup of a prior art lacrosse stick to the Patent and Trademark Office.
After Warrior and STX settled their litigation, Warrior filed a malpractice suit in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan alleging that, due to negligence by the Dickinson Wright lawyers, Warrior had to settle its infringement action with STX for less than Warrior might have otherwise received. The district court dismissed the malpractice suit, however, on the ground that it involved state law issues. Dickinson Wright appealed the dismissal to the Federal Circuit.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
There is no efficient market for the sale of bankruptcy assets. Inefficient markets yield a transactional drag, potentially dampening the ability of debtors and trustees to maximize value for creditors. This article identifies ways in which investors may more easily discover bankruptcy asset sales.
A federal district court in Miami, FL, has ruled that former National Basketball Association star Shaquille O'Neal will have to face a lawsuit over his promotion of unregistered securities in the form of cryptocurrency tokens and that he was a "seller" of these unregistered securities.
Why is it that those who are best skilled at advocating for others are ill-equipped at advocating for their own skills and what to do about it?
Blockchain domain names offer decentralized alternatives to traditional DNS-based domain names, promising enhanced security, privacy and censorship resistance. However, these benefits come with significant challenges, particularly for brand owners seeking to protect their trademarks in these new digital spaces.
In Rockwell v. Despart, the New York Supreme Court, Third Department, recently revisited a recurring question: When may a landowner seek judicial removal of a covenant restricting use of her land?